1. To the lay person (the juror or the judge), the temporarily delirious patient 'leaping over chairs and taking the broomstick to hallucinatory monsters' [still] looks more genuinely psychotic than a deeply disordered but calm and brittle-worded schizophrenic;Michael L Perlin;The Medico-Legal Dilemma: A Suggested Solution, 42 J. CRIM. L. & CRIMINOLOGY,1952
2. There Hope for a Just Jurisprudence in an Era of Responsibility/Consequences Talk?, 57 ARK. L. REV. 447, 499 n. 336 (2004) (quoting Perlin, supra note 103, at 679). Purportedly, in a capital case, prospective jurors who are not willing to give meaningful consideration to mental health mitigation evidence, even after the client has been convicted of a deatheligible murder, are not qualified to sit on the jury;Ellen Byers;Mentally Ill Criminal Offenders and the Strict Liability Effect: Is,1992