Abstract
<p style="text-align:justify">This study is designed to illuminate the role of four key constructs—teacher-student relationships, peer networks, satisfaction with support services, and employability trust—in shaping the social capital within universities. Utilising a sample of 1902 working students derived from the Eurostudent VII survey data, this research applies both exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis to validate the proposed model. The findings indicate that all four constructs demonstrate statistically significant and positive associations with university social capital. Crucially, the measures of reliability and validity are within an acceptable range, lending credibility to the findings. The teacher-student relationship was found to be the most influential factor, highlighting its crucial value in the functioning of social capital inside universities. Along with providing a framework for future studies on the ever-changing nature of social capital in universities, the results highlight the significance of cultivating an interconnected academic community, which enriches the educational organisation as a whole.</p>
Publisher
Eurasian Society of Educational Research
Reference44 articles.
1. Aslam, R., & Khan, N. (2020). Constructive feedback and students' academic achievement: A theoretical framework. New Horizons, 14(2), 175-198. https://bit.ly/3y9oy3b
2. Astin, A. W. (1984). Student involvement: A developmental theory for higher education. Journal of College Student Development, 40(5), 518-529. https://t.ly/DYhWm
3. Baker-Doyle, K. J. (2015). No teacher is an island: How social networks shape teacher quality. International Perspectives on Education and Society, 27, 367-383. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1479-367920140000027005
4. Bean, J. P., & Bradley, R. K. (1986). Untangling the satisfaction-performance relationship for college students. Journal of Higher Education, 57(4), 393-412. https://doi.org/10.2307/1980994
5. Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88(3), 588-606. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588