Patient preferences regarding antiretroviral therapy

Author:

Miller Loren G1,Huffman Heather B2,Weidmer Beverly A3,Hays Ron D4

Affiliation:

1. Division of Infectious Diseases, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance and UCLA AIDS Institute Center for AIDS Research, Los Angeles, California, USA

2. School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles

3. RAND, Santa Monica; alth Services, University of California, Los Angeles, USA

4. UCLA AIDS Institute Center for AIDS Research, Los Angeles; RAND, Santa Monica; Dept of Health Services, University of California, Los Angeles and Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA

Abstract

Antiretroviral medications for HIV infection can be combined into dozens of recommended regimens. However, little is known about patient preferences regarding antiretroviral therapy. We assessed the impact of clinician-mutable adherence barriers by conducting four patient focus groups (two English and two Spanish) consisting of 30 patients that focused discussion on antiretroviral treatment preferences. We also surveyed antiretroviral treatment preference from 31 subjects using the method of paired comparisons in which subjects indicated their preferences of regimen potency, pill burden, inconvenience, and side-effects using a 10-point rating scale. We found that most patients would tolerate severe side-effects, inconvenience, and large pill burden to have a potent antiretroviral regimen. In our population, patients generally preferred regimens with fewer side-effects to those with less inconvenience. Pill burden was of least importance among the domains studied. These preferences should be considered when selecting a regimen and developing interventions to improve antiretroviral adherence and patient outcomes.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Infectious Diseases,Pharmacology (medical),Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Dermatology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3