Actin machinery and mechanosensitivity in invadopodia, podosomes and focal adhesions
Author:
Albiges-Rizo Corinne1, Destaing Olivier1, Fourcade Bertrand12, Planus Emmanuelle1, Block Marc R.1
Affiliation:
1. INSERM U823 Institut Albert Bonniot, Université Joseph Fourier, CNRS ERL3148, Equipe DySAD, Site Santé, BP 170, 38042 Grenoble, Cedex 9, France 2. Université Joseph Fourier, Structure et Propriétés des Architectures Moléculaires, UMR5819 CNRS, CEA-Grenoble, 17 rue des Martyrs, 38054 Grenoble, Cedex 9, France
Abstract
The invasiveness of cells is correlated with the presence of dynamic actin-rich membrane structures called invadopodia, which are membrane protrusions that are associated with localized polymerization of sub-membrane actin filaments. Similar to focal adhesions and podosomes, invadopodia are cell-matrix adhesion sites. Indeed, invadopodia share several features with podosomes, but whether they are distinct structures is still a matter of debate. Invadopodia are built upon an N-WASP-dependent branched actin network, and the Rho GTPase Cdc42 is involved in inducing invadopodial-membrane protrusion, which is mediated by actin filaments that are organized in bundles to form an actin core. Actin-core formation is thought to be an early step in invadopodium assembly, and the actin core is perpendicular to the extracellular matrix and the plasma membrane; this contrasts with the tangential orientation of actin stress fibers anchored to focal adhesions. In this Commentary, we attempt to summarize recent insights into the actin dynamics of invadopodia and podosomes, and the forces that are transmitted through these invasive structures. Although the mechanisms underlying force-dependent regulation of invadopodia and podosomes are largely unknown compared with those of focal adhesions, these structures do exhibit mechanosensitivity. Actin dynamics and associated forces might be key elements in discriminating between invadopodia, podosomes and focal adhesions. Targeting actin-regulatory molecules that specifically promote invadopodium formation is an attractive strategy against cancer-cell invasion.
Publisher
The Company of Biologists
Reference149 articles.
1. Abou-Kheir, W., Isaac, B., Yamaguchi, H. and Cox, D. (2008). Membrane targeting of WAVE2 is not sufficient for WAVE2-dependent actin polymerization: a role for IRSp53 in mediating the interaction between Rac and WAVE2. J. Cell Sci.121, 379-390. 2. Abram, C. L., Seals, D. F., Pass, I., Salinsky, D., Maurer, L., Roth, T. M. and Courtneidge, S. A. (2003). The adaptor protein fish associates with members of the ADAMs family and localizes to podosomes of Src-transformed cells. J. Biol. Chem.278, 16844-16851. 3. Alexander, N. R., Branch, K. M., Parekh, A., Clark, E. S., Iwueke, I. C., Guelcher, S. A. and Weaver, A. M. (2008). Extracellular matrix rigidity promotes invadopodia activity. Curr. Biol.18, 1295-1299. 4. Applewhite, D. A., Barzik, M., Kojima, S., Svitkina, T. M., Gertler, F. B. and Borisy, G. G. (2007). Ena/VASP proteins have an anti-capping independent function in filopodia formation. Mol. Biol. Cell18, 2579-2591. 5. Arnold, M., Cavalcanti-Adam, E. A., Glass, R., Blummel, J., Eck, W., Kantlehner, M., Kessler, H. and Spatz, J. P. (2004). Activation of integrin function by nanopatterned adhesive interfaces. Chemphyschem5, 383-388.
Cited by
279 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|