Affiliation:
1. University of Central Arkansas, USA
2. Johns Hopkins University, USA
Abstract
For an instructor in higher education, implementing service-learning (S-L) into a new or existing course can simultaneously be an exciting but potentially challenging experience. While S-L has the potential to make positive impacts on both the community of interest and subsequent students, instructors implementing S-L may face challenges such as project and partner identification. Another potential challenge for the instructor is determining which type of instructional approach they should select to implement S-L. To help guide higher education instructors in this selection process, this chapter features a collective case study of S-L projects conducted within three different undergraduate courses, using three different instructional approaches, at the University of Central Arkansas. Each of these courses has successfully utilized a different instructional approach: 1) collaborative consultation, 2) guided discovery, and 3) learner-centered. Using a collective case study of S-L courses, this chapter discusses in detail the implementation of each S-L project from start to finish.
Reference55 articles.
1. Using a learner-centered approach to develop an educational technology course.;M.Abdelmalak;International Journal on Teaching and Learning in Higher Education,2013
2. Development of Discovery Learning Tools to Facilitate Junior High School Students’ Mathematical Understanding Ability
3. American Association of Family & Consumer Sciences (AAFCS). (2023). What is FCS? Available online at: https://www.aafcs.org/about/about-us/what-is-fcs. (Accessed November 6, 2023).
4. Balim, A. G. (2009). The effects of discovery learning on students' success and inquiry learning skills. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research (EJER), (35).
5. Effects of Guided Discovery and Think-Pair-Share Strategies on Secondary School Students’ Achievement in Chemistry