Ensuring Reliability and Validity in Qualitative Social Sciences Research

Author:

Mosbah Aissa1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Dhofar University, Oman

Abstract

Social sciences (SS) researchers have produced far less qualitative than quantitative research. This is due to many factors including particularly the lack of straightforward and easy-to-implement guidelines that would help researchers in the process of ensuring research rigor through reliability, validity, and/or other concepts. Nonetheless, the extant literature shows that most qualitative research measures on research rigor were developed in nursing, which is a natural science discipline, and that social science researchers often adopt these measures in their works. This chapter focuses on multiculturalism in business management discipline, as a rapidly growing field of the SS. While multiculturalism has become a key feature and a determinant of organizational success in today's rapidly globalized business environments, it may be a source of bias in qualitative research. Most importantly, the chapter develops a set of measures/techniques that will aid qualitative social science researchers, and business researchers specifically, on how to ensure research rigor.

Publisher

IGI Global

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3