Developing a New Functional Skills Maths (Paper-Based) Initial Assessment and Exploring Its Effectiveness

Author:

Norley Kevin1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. The Bedford College Group, UK

Abstract

This chapter is based on a research-based assessment development initiative at the Bedford College Group. The need for a new initial assessment for functional skills maths arose due to the expiration of the college's existing licence. The development of this new assessment aimed to evaluate similar skills and foundational knowledge as the previous one while maintaining comparable grade boundaries that reflect students' current proficiency levels to help place them on suitable courses. This study suggests that an initial assessment should serve the dual purpose of determining a learner's level and gaining insight into their mathematical skills and foundational knowledge. This is achieved by providing opportunities for students to demonstrate problem-solving methods, enabling teachers to assess and evaluate these approaches. These insights formed the foundation for designing and developing the department-based functional skills maths initial assessment, which underwent testing as part of a BRIEF project. The questions, all of which were linked to aspects of familiar daily life, were also designed to reflect Subject Content Statements (SCSs) at the different levels of functional skills maths, from an awarding body's Subject Content Mapping document. During the study, students' results from the existing initial assessment were compared with those from the department-based assessment. The findings indicated that students' scores in the department-based initial assessment were within ten percent of those from the current one. Two student groups were assessed: adults and 16–18-year-old ESOL (English for Speakers of Other Languages) students, representing the two cohorts studying functional skills maths within the Department of Adult English and Maths. The research demonstrates that the department-based initial assessment effectively replaces the existing one. Its administration and grading are straightforward, in contrast to online math assessments, and it incurs minimal costs. Moreover, the study underscores the superiority of paper-based math initial assessments over online ones for a particular group of students, highlighting their efficiency, accuracy, and suitability for post-16 education settings.

Publisher

IGI Global

Reference21 articles.

1. A Consideration to Two Main Ethical Issues In Educational Research, and How May These Be Addressed

2. British Educational Research Association [BERA] (2018). Ethical Guidelines for Educational Research, fourth edition. https://www.bera.ac.uk/publication/ethical-guidelines-for-educational-research-2018

3. Content and Formal Schemata in ESL Reading

4. Confederation of British Industry (CBI). (2006) Working on the Three Rs: Employers’ Priorities for Functional Skills in Maths and English, London: DfES.

5. Autoethnography: A methodology to elucidate our own coaching practice;J.James;International Journal of Evidence Based Coaching and Mentoring,2015

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3