Affiliation:
1. Griffith University, Australia
Abstract
The complex problems facing the world today resist solutions. The reasons are the complex, multidisciplinary, interdependent variables, and the non-optimal behaviour of stakeholders that lead to unsolvable “wicked” problems. Analysis of these complex situations requires methodologies that can deal with this complex, incomplete, and inconsistent data. Neutrosophy has evolved specifically to deal with the indeterminate nature of such data. Some researchers have considered both configurational analysis and neutrosophy. Neutrosophy examines the neutralities and the interplays between opposites whereas configurational analysis isolates the neutralities and focuses on the interplay between opposites. This chapter examines a configurational approach that is simple and arithmetic in nature and does not preclude a focus on the neutralities, so is compatible with neutrosophic logic, statistics, and probability analysis.
Reference23 articles.
1. Systemic Design Principles in Social Innovation: A Study of Expert Practices and Design Rationales
2. Practitioner-centred research and the Ph.D.
3. Ebbs, G. (2018). Visualising database content using Metadata (Masters Interactive Media Exegesis). Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia. Retrieved from https://github.com/giobono/metadex/blob/master/GEbbs_s2980212_Exegesis.pdf
4. Ebbs, G. (2023). Analysis of submissions to Food Security Inquiry. Retrieved from Canberra Australia: https://www.aph.gov.au/DocumentStore.ashx?id=34221367-8589-40fe-a628-07b47ccb435f&subId=744530
5. Gibson-Graham, J. K. (2006). A postcapitalist politics. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.