Quality Management

Author:

Vecchi Alessandra1,Brennan Louis2

Affiliation:

1. University of London Arts, England

2. Trinity College Dublin, Ireland

Abstract

The purpose of this chapter is to address the extent to which quality management is “culture-specific.” The chapter presents the results of a survey administered across 21 countries that seeks to examine quality priorities and practices by adopting the Global Leadership and Organizational Behaviour Effectiveness (GLOBE) framework (House et al., 2004). Drawing on previous research (Vecchi & Brennan, 2011), data was collected in 2009 as part of the fifth iteration of the International Manufacturing Strategy Survey (IMSS). The methodology involved the use of a self-administered questionnaire to director/head of operations/manufacturing in best practice firms within the sector of firms classified by ISIC codes (rev.3.1) Divisions 28-35. From this study, it emerges that adopting the GLOBE framework provides an invaluable insight into understanding quality management across countries. While some previous research portrays quality management as a comprehensive management paradigm with elements and relationships that transcend cultural and national boundaries, the current study provides evidence that the adoption of certain quality practices across different countries can follow distinctive patterns.

Publisher

IGI Global

Reference55 articles.

1. Quality practices in the manufacturing industry in the UK and Malaysia

2. The development of a contingency model relating national culture to total quality management.;S. A.Anwar;International Journal of Management,2006

3. Child, J., & Kieser, A. (1979). Organisational and Management Roles in British and German Companies: An Examination of the Culture-Free Thesis. In C.J. Lammus & D.J. Hickson (Eds.), Organisations Alike and Unlike. London: Routledge.

4. A Comparative Study of Quality Management Practices in Hong Kong and Shanghai Manufacturing Industries.;K. S.Chin;International Journal of Management,2002

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3