Analysis of Discourse Practices in Elementary Science Classrooms using Argument-Based Inquiry during Whole-Class Dialogue

Author:

Benus Matthew J.1,Yarker Morgan B.2,Hand Brian M.2,Norton-Meier Lori A.3

Affiliation:

1. Indiana University Northwest, USA

2. University of Iowa, USA

3. University of Louisville, USA

Abstract

This chapter discusses an analysis of discourse practices found in eight different elementary science classrooms that have implemented the Science Writing Heuristic (SWH) approach to argument-based inquiry. The analysis for this study involved examining a segment of whole-class talk that began after a small group presented its claim and evidence and ended when the discussion moved on to a new topic, or when a different group presented. The framework for the analysis of this whole-class dialogue developed through an iterative process that was first informed by previous analysis, review and modification of other instruments, and notable anomalies of difference from this data set. Each classroom was then rated using the Reform Teaching Observation Protocol (RTOP), which provided a score for the extent to which the teacher was engaged with reform-based science teaching practices. Our analysis shows that elements of whole-class dialogue in argument-based inquiry classrooms were different across varying levels of RTOP implementation. Overall, low level RTOP implementation (little evidence of reformed-based practice) had a question and answer format during whole class talk that rarely included discourse around scientific reasoning and justification. Higher levels of RTOP implementation were more likely to be focused on student use of scientific evidence to anchor and develop a scientific understanding of “big ideas” in science. These findings are discussed in relation to teacher professional development in argument-based inquiry, science literacy, and the teacher’s and students’ grasp of science practice.

Publisher

IGI Global

Reference80 articles.

1. Small-group discussion in physics: Peer interaction modes in pairs and fours

2. Ametller, J., & Scott, P. (2009). Classroom discourse, dialogic teaching and teacher professional development in science education: A selective review of the literature. Retrieved April 16, 2010, from https://www.ntnu.no/wiki/download/attachments/8324755/Final+draft_lit_review_Leeds.doc

3. Scientific arguments as learning artifacts: designing for learning from the web with KIE

4. Making sense of argumentation and explanation

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Using Social Media to Improve Peer Dialogue in an Online Course About Regional Climate Modeling;Research Anthology on Applying Social Networking Strategies to Classrooms and Libraries;2022-07-08

2. Using Social Media to Improve Peer Dialogue in an Online Course About Regional Climate Modeling;International Journal of Online Pedagogy and Course Design;2018-10

3. Preservice Elementary Teachers’ Instructional Practices and the Teaching Science as Argument Framework;Science & Education;2016-12

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3