Traditional vs. Machine-Learning Techniques for OSM Quality Assessment

Author:

Jilani Musfira1,Bertolotto Michela2,Corcoran Padraig3,Alghanim Amerah2

Affiliation:

1. National University of Ireland, Ireland

2. University College Dublin, Ireland

3. Cardiff University, UK

Abstract

Nowadays an ever-increasing number of applications require complete and up-to-date spatial data, in particular maps. However, mapping is an expensive process and the vastness and dynamics of our world usually render centralized and authoritative maps outdated and incomplete. In this context crowd-sourced maps have the potential to provide a complete, up-to-date, and free representation of our world. However, the proliferation of such maps largely remains limited due to concerns about their data quality. While most of the current data quality assessment mechanisms for such maps require referencing to authoritative maps, we argue that such referencing of a crowd-sourced spatial database is ineffective. Instead we focus on the use of machine learning techniques that we believe have the potential to not only allow the assessment but also to recommend the improvement of the quality of crowd-sourced maps without referencing to external databases. This chapter gives an overview of these approaches.

Publisher

IGI Global

Reference90 articles.

1. Assigning trust to wikipedia content.;B. T.Adler;Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Wikis,2008

2. A two-layer conditional random field model for simultaneous classification of land cover and land use. ISPRS International Archives of the Photogrammetry;L.Albert;Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences,2014

3. Ambiguity and plausibility

4. Towards rule-guided classification for volunteered geographic information. ISPRS Annals of Photogrammetry;A. L.Ali;Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences,2015

5. Semantifying OpenStreetMap.;A.Baglatzi;Proceedings of the 5th International Terra Cognita Workshop,2012

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3