Promoting Civic Thinking through Epistemic Game Play

Author:

Bagley Elizabeth A. S.1,Shaffer David Williamson1

Affiliation:

1. University of Wisconsin-Madison, USA

Abstract

A growing body of research suggests that computer games can help players learn to integrate knowledge and skills with values in complex domains of real-world problem solving (P. C. Adams, 1998; Barab et al., 2001; Gee, 2003; Shaffer et al., 2005; Starr, 1994). In particular, research suggests that epistemic games—games where players think and act like real world professionals—can link knowledge, skills, and values into professional ways of thinking (Shaffer, 2006). Here, we look at how a ten hour version of the epistemic game Urban Science developed civic thinking in young people as they learned about urban ecology by role-playing as urban planners redesigning a city. Specifically, we ask whether and how overcoming authentic obstacles from the profession of urban planning in the virtual world of a role playing game can link civic values with the knowledge and skills young people need to solve complex social and ecological problems. Our results from coded pre- and post-interviews show that players learned to think of cities as complex systems, learned about skills that planners use to enact change in these systems, and perhaps most important, learned the value of serving the public in that process. Two aspects of the game, tool-as-obstacle and stakeholders-as-obstacle, contributed to the development of players’ civic thinking. Thus, our results suggest that games like Urban Science may help young people—and thus help all of us—identify and address the many civic, economic, and environmental challenges in an increasingly complex, and increasingly urban, world.

Publisher

IGI Global

Reference26 articles.

1. Teaching and Learning with SimCity 2000

2. Adams, R. (2007, August 27). Now, where is America anyway? Guardian. Retrieved September 26, 2010, from http://blogs.guardian.co.uk/news/archives/2007/08/27/now_where_is_america_anyway.html

3. American Planning Association. (2010). What is Planning? Retrieved September 26, 2010, from http://www.planning.org/aboutplanning/whatisplanning.htm#2

4. Association of Collegiate Schools of Planning. (2009). Career Guide. Retrieved September 26, 2010, from http://www.acsp.org/sites/default/files/ACSP_2009_FINAL_Book[1].pdf

5. Bagley, E. (2010). Epistemography of an Urban and Regional Planning Practicum: Appropriation in the Face of Resistance (WCER Working Paper 2010-8). Madison: University of Wisconsin-Madison, Wisconsin Center for Education Research.

Cited by 12 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Is QE Just ENA?;Communications in Computer and Information Science;2023

2. The Role of a Virtual Internship in Developing Preservice Teachers’ Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge;Boğaziçi Üniversitesi Eğitim Dergisi;2021-09-16

3. Towards Value-Adaptive Instruction: A Data-Driven Method for Addressing Bias in Argument Evaluation Tasks;Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems;2020-04-21

4. Designing for identity in game-based learning;Mind, Culture, and Activity;2019-01-02

5. Grim FATE: Learning About Systems Thinking in an In-Depth Climate Change Simulation;Simulation & Gaming;2018-03-01

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3