On the Identification of Modeler Communities

Author:

van der Linden Dirk1,Hoppenbrouwers Stijn J.B.A.2,Proper Henderik A.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Public Research Centre Henri Tudor, Luxembourg, Luxembourg & Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, Netherlands & EE-Team, Luxembourg

2. HAN University of Applied Sciences, Arnhem, Netherlands & Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, Netherlands & EE-Team, Nijmegen, Netherlands

Abstract

The authors discuss the use and challenges of identifying communities with shared semantics in Enterprise Modeling (EM). People tend to understand modeling meta-concepts (i.e., a modeling language's constructs or types) in a certain way and can be grouped by this conceptual understanding. Having an insight into the typical communities and their composition (e.g., what kind of people constitute such a semantic community) can make it easier to predict how a conceptual modeler with a certain background will generally understand the meta-concepts s/he uses, which is useful for e.g., validating model semantics and improving the efficiency of the modeling process itself. The authors have observed that in practice decisions to group people based on certain shared properties are often made, but are rarely backed up by empirical data demonstrating their supposed efficacy. The authors demonstrate the use of psychometric data from two studies involving experienced (enterprise) modeling practitioners and computing science students to find such communities. The authors also discuss the challenge that arises in finding common real-world factors shared between their members to identify them by and conclude that there is no empirical support for commonly used (and often implicit) grouping properties such as similar background, focus and modeling language.

Publisher

IGI Global

Subject

Management of Technology and Innovation,Information Systems

Reference58 articles.

1. Alani, H., & Shadbolt, N. (2002). Identifying communities of practice: Analysing ontologies as networks to support community recognition. In Proceedings of the 2002 IFIP World Computer Congress.

2. A proposal to evaluate ontology content.;M. B.Almeida;Applied Ontology,2009

3. Ayala, C. P., Cares, C., Carvallo, J. P., Grau, G., Haya, M., & Salazar, G. … Quer, C. (2005). A comparative analysis of i*-based agent-oriented modeling languages. In Proceedings of the Seventeenth International Conference on Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering (SEKE’05), Taipei, Taiwan (pp. 43–50).

4. Barjis, J., Kolfschoten, G., & Verbraeck, A. (2009). Collaborative enterprise modeling. In Proper, E., Harmsen, F., & Dietz, J. (Eds.), Advances in enterprise engineering II (vol. 28 of Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, pp. 50–62). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

5. Bidarra, R., Van Den Berg, E., & Bronsvoort, W. (2001). Collaborative modeling with features. In Proceedings of ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference (DETC’01).

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. A hierarchical framework for concepts in physical geography;Progress in Physical Geography: Earth and Environment;2018-09-03

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3