Affiliation:
1. Lancaster University, UK
2. The Manufacturing Institute, UK
Abstract
The effects of climate change and government legislation has changed the way in which manufacturers can dispose of their waste, encouraging SMEs to source alternative disposal methods such as those indicated in the waste hierarchy. It is economically and environmentally beneficial to use product recovery methods to divert waste from landfill. The environmental impact of two product recovery methods, remanufacturing and repairing, has been compared via a carbon footprint calculation for a UK-based SME. The calculation has identified that repairing has a lower carbon footprint than remanufacturing, however this only extends the original life-cycle of the product, whereas remanufacturing provides a new life-cycle and warranty, and therefore seen as the most preferable method of product recovery to support sustainable manufacturing.
Subject
Mechanical Engineering,Mechanics of Materials
Reference30 articles.
1. Allwood, J. (2005). What is sustainable manufacturing? Paper presented at the Sustainable Manufacturing Seminar Series. Retrived from www.ifm.eng.cam.ac.uk/sustainability/seminar/documents/050216lo.pdf
2. The impact of economic activity in Asturias on greenhouse gas emissions: Consequences for environmental policy within the Kyoto Protocol framework.;M.Argüelles;Journal of Environmental Management,2006
3. Metals recycling: economic and environmental implications
4. Brown, T. (2010). Sustainable manufacturing: Regeneration through remanufacture. The Manufacturer, 13.
5. The impact of the European landfill directive on waste management in the United Kingdom