Robotic Technologies and Fundamental Rights

Author:

Koops Bert-Jaap1,Di Carlo Angela2,Nocco Luca2,Casamassima Vincenzo2,Stradella Elettra3

Affiliation:

1. Tilburg Institute for Law, Technology, and Society (TILT), Tilburg, Netherlands

2. Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Pisa, Italy

3. University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy

Abstract

Robotic technologies?constructed systems that interact with their environment in a way that displays some level of agency?are increasingly intertwined with human life and human bodies. This raises many regulatory questions, since current legal frameworks have few robotics-specific provisions and robotics pose new challenges to legal notions and underlying assumptions. To help guide the regulation of robotics, fundamental rights should provide a basic touchstone. However, the constitutional framework of fundamental rights is itself not immune to being influenced by robotics. This paper discusses how the protection of fundamental rights is affected by robotics technologies, taking into account the mutual-shaping process of fundamental rights, regulation, and technology. After a general overview of how fundamental rights are challenged by robotics technologies, we zoom in on three specific application domains: industrial robotics and the issue of workers’ rights and liability, assistive technology with a focus on autonomy and privacy of elderly and disabled people, and biomedical robotics (including brain-machine interfaces) in relation to informed consent and self-determination. The analysis highlights diverse implications of robotics in light of fundamental rights and values, suggesting that regulators will have to deal with rights and value conflicts arising from robotics developments. To help address these conflicts, a set of shared norms, standards and guidelines could be developed that may, in the form of soft-law, serve as a bridge between abstract fundamental rights and concrete robotics practice.

Publisher

IGI Global

Subject

Social Sciences (miscellaneous),Engineering (miscellaneous)

Reference78 articles.

1. Protecting workers faced with job loss due to new technology: The EEC approach.;L.Allan Lugo;Comparative Labor Law Journal,1987

2. Automating the workplace: Mandatory bargaining under Otis II.;J. L.Atkinson;University of Illinois Law Review,1989

3. Corpus Juris Roboticum.;R.August;Computer/Law Journal,1988

4. Is industrial innovation destroying jobs?;B.Bartlett;The Cato Journal,1985

Cited by 14 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. THE USE OF ROBOTS IN PUBLIC SAFETY: A SPATIAL TAXONOMY;SAVSAD Savunma ve Savaş Araştırmaları Dergisi;2023-06-21

2. Speculating About Robot Moral Standing: On the Constitution of Social Robots as Objects of Governance;Frontiers in Robotics and AI;2021-12-02

3. Trust in robot futures: The role of sociotechnical potential;Információs Társadalom;2020-10-20

4. Labour Law: Challenges of Digital Society;Law. Journal of the Higher School of Economics;2020-06-10

5. Inescapable Frameworks: Ethics of Care, Ethics of Rights and the Responsible Research and Innovation Model;Philosophy of Management;2019-12-13

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3