Author:
AlKhamis Amal,Dweiri Fikri
Abstract
This paper responds to the concern with the lack of public governance indicators for Accessible and Inclusive Urban Developments (AIUDs) despite agreements in the literature and in practice to develop field-specific governance indicators to resolve intricate problems. AIUD is known as a multi-disciplinary and multi-sectorial field requiring various sectors’ involvement. The resources needed to resolve this issue are scattered across diverse sectors. Furthermore, accessibility for and inclusion of disabled and elderly people is considered a global challenge. International organizations like the United Nations (UN), the Inclusion International (II) and the World Bank (WB) have addressed this concern. The UN prioritized this vital issue in its robust Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) (2015-2030). AIUDs significantly impacted social inclusion, human welfare and economic development warrants developing governance indicators. This facilitates decision making, international performance comparisons, benchmarking, assessing governance quality and adopting corrective measures which improve the service delivery system. This study endeavours to develop a set of governance indicators for AIDUs in the UAE through a systematic literature review and the inputs gleaned from a group of experts by administering a questionnaire survey.
Publisher
University Of Sharjah - Scientific Publishing Unit
Reference33 articles.
1. AlKhamis, A., Dweiri, F., &Altan, H. (2019). Application of Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) Tools in Governance Evaluation of Accessible and Inclusive Urban Developments (AIUD). IEOM Society International. 3494 - 3503
2. Antunes, P., Kallis, G., Videira, N.,&Santos, R. (2009) Participation and evaluation for sustainable river basin governance. Ecological Economics68, 931 - 939. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.12.004
3. Blunt, P. (1995). Cultural relativism, ‘good ‘governance and sustainable human development. Public Administration and Development, 15 (1), 1 - 9. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.4230150102
4. Bovaird, T.,& Loffler, E. (2003). Evaluating the quality of public Governance: Indicators, Models and Methodologies. SAGE Journals, 69, 313 - 328. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852303693002
5. Bovaird, T., & Loffler, E. (2002). Moving from excellence models of local services delivery to benchmarking ‘Good Local Governance’. International Review of Administrative Sciences68, 9 - 24. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852302681001
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Examining the Extent of and Determinants of SDG Reporting;Journal of Accounting and Finance in Emerging Economies;2023-09-30