Teleaudiology Services for Rehabilitation With Hearing Aids in Adults: A Systematic Review

Author:

Tao Karina F. M.123,Brennan-Jones Christopher G.124,Capobianco-Fava Dirce M.56,Jayakody Dona M. P.12,Friedland Peter L.1278,Swanepoel De Wet129,Eikelboom Robert H.129

Affiliation:

1. Ear Sciences Centre, The University of Western Australia, Nedlands, WA

2. Ear Science Institute Australia, Nedlands, WA

3. CAPES Foundation, Ministry of Education of Brazil, Brasilia, DF

4. Telethon Kids Institute, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, Australia

5. Department of Emergency Medicine and Evidence-Based Medicine, Paulista School of Medicine, Universidade Federal de São Paulo [Federal University of Sao Paulo], Brazil

6. HiTalk Comunicação & Consultoria Ltda, Sao Paulo, Brazil

7. Department of Otolaryngology Head & Neck Skull Base Surgery, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands, WA, Australia

8. School of Medicine, The University of Notre Dame, Fremantle, WA, Australia

9. Department of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology, University of Pretoria, South Africa

Abstract

Purpose This review examined (a) the current evidence from studies on teleaudiology applications for rehabilitation of adults with hearing impairment with hearing aids and (b) whether it is sufficient to support the translation into routine clinical practice. Method A search strategy and eligibility criteria were utilized to include articles specifically related to hearing aid fitting and follow-up procedures that are involved in consultations for the rehabilitation of adults, where the service was provided by the clinician by teleaudiology. A search using key words and Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) was conducted on the main electronic databases that index health-related studies. The included studies were assessed using validated evaluation tools for methodological quality, level of evidence, and grade recommendations for application into practice. Results Fourteen studies were identified as being within the scope of this review. The evaluation tools showed that none of these studies demonstrated either a strong methodological quality or high level of evidence. Analysis of evidence identified 19 activities, which were classified into service outcomes categories of feasibility, barriers, efficiency, quality, and effectiveness. Recommendations could be made regarding the (a) feasibility, (b) barriers, and (c) efficiency of teleaudiology for the rehabilitation of hearing loss with hearing aids. Conclusion This review provides up-to-date evidence for teleaudiology hearing aid services in new and experienced hearing aid users in different practice settings. Findings direct future research priorities to strengthen evidence-based practice. There is a need for further studies of many aspects of teleaudiology services for rehabilitation with hearing aids to support their implementation into clinical practice. Supplemental Material https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.6534473

Publisher

American Speech Language Hearing Association

Subject

Speech and Hearing,Linguistics and Language,Language and Linguistics

Reference70 articles.

1. American Academy of Audiology. (2006). Guidelines for the audiologic management of adult hearing impairment. Retrieved from http://www.audiology.org/publications-resources/document-library/adult-rehabilitation-hearing-aids

2. American Society of Plastic Surgeons. (2011). ASPS evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Retrieved from https://www.plasticsurgery.org/for-medical-professionals/quality-and-registries/evidence-based-clinical-practice-guidelines/description-and-development-of-evidence-based-practice-guidelines and http://edmgr.ovid.com/prs/accounts/ifauth.htm

3. American Society of Plastic Surgeons. (2016). ASPS evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Retrieved from https://www.plasticsurgery.org/for-medical-professionals/quality-and-registries/evidence-based-clinical-practice-guidelines

4. Better Information for Better Health Care: The Evidence-based Practice Center Program and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality

5. Audiology Society of Australia. (2013). Audiology Australia professional practice standards—Part B. Clinical standards. Retrieved from http://audiology.asn.au/standards-downloads/Clinical%20Standards%20-%20whole%20document%20July13%201.pdf

Cited by 44 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3