Affiliation:
1. Department of Communicative Sciences and Disorders, New York University, NY
2. École d’orthophonie et d’audiologie, Université de Montréal, Québec, Canada
Abstract
Purpose
Somatosensory targets and feedback are instrumental in ensuring accurate speech production. Individuals differ in their ability to access and respond to somatosensory information, but there is no established standard for measuring somatosensory acuity. The primary objective of this study was to determine which of three measures of somatosensory acuity had the strongest association with change in production accuracy in a vowel learning task, while controlling for the better studied covariate of auditory acuity.
Method
Three somatosensory tasks were administered to 20 female college students: an oral stereognosis task, a bite block task with auditory masking, and a novel phonetic awareness task. Individual scores from the tasks were compared to their performance on a speech learning task in which participants were trained to produce novel Mandarin vowels with visual biofeedback.
Results
Of the three tasks, only bite block adaptation with auditory masking was significantly associated with performance in the speech learning task. Participants with weaker somatosensory acuity tended to demonstrate larger increases in production accuracy over the course of training.
Conclusions
The bite block adaptation task measures proprioceptive awareness rather than tactile acuity and assesses somatosensory knowledge implicitly, with limited metalinguistic demands. This small-scale study provides preliminary evidence that these characteristics may be desirable for the assessment of oral somatosensory acuity, at least in the context of vowel learning tasks. Well-normed somatosensory measures could be of clinical utility by informing diagnosis/prognosis and treatment planning.
Supplemental Material
https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.14044082
Publisher
American Speech Language Hearing Association
Reference53 articles.
1. Arndt, W. B. , Elbert, M. , & Shelton, R. L. (1970). Standardization of a test of oral stereognosis. In Bosma, J. F. (Ed.), Second Symposium on Oral Sensation and Perception (pp. 379–383). Charles C Thomas.
2. Relationships between oral sensory feedback skills and adaptation to delayed auditory feedback
3. Audacity Team. (2019). Audacity(R): Free audio editor and recorder (Version 2.3.3) [Computer application]
.
https://audacityteam.org/
4. The development of speech adaptation to an artificial palate
5. Representation of Object Size in the Somatosensory System
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献