Analysis of Discourse Production to Assess Cognitive Communication Deficits Following Mild Traumatic Brain Injury With and Without Posttraumatic Stress

Author:

Myers Jennifer Rae1ORCID,Solomon Nancy Pearl12ORCID,Lange Rael T.34567,French Louis M.234ORCID,Lippa Sara M.4ORCID,Brickell Tracey A.23467ORCID,Staines Shelby8,Nelson Jenna9ORCID,Brungart Doug S.12ORCID,Coelho Carl A.8ORCID

Affiliation:

1. National Military Audiology and Speech Pathology Center, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD

2. Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD

3. Traumatic Brain Injury Center of Excellence, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD

4. National Intrepid Center of Excellence, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD

5. University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

6. General Dynamics Information Technology, Falls Church, VA

7. Center of Excellence on Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

8. University of Connecticut, Storrs

9. University of Maryland, College Park

Abstract

Purpose: Cognitive communication deficits can be difficult to assess in individuals with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). However, the use of discourse analysis as a direct and sensitive metric of cognitive communication skills has shown promising clinical utility for other TBI severity levels. This exploratory study investigated discourse production in service members and veterans (SMVs) with uncomplicated mTBI with and without posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and SMVs with neither mTBI or PTSD. Method: Fifteen SMVs with mTBI and PTSD, 26 with mTBI, and 25 controls with no brain injury (NBI) and without PTSD were given a wordless picture story to elicit spontaneous discourse. Discourse samples were analyzed for global coherence, word count, the use of negative emotion words, cognitive process words, nonfluencies, and story completeness. Results: Results revealed a significant difference between the mTBI ( Mdn = 3.33) and NBI ( Mdn = 3.50) groups, χ 2 (3) = 6.044, p = .017, ε 2 = .03, for global coherence. Word count differed significantly between the mTBI + PTSD ( Mdn = 135) and NBI ( Mdn = 195) groups, χ 2 (3) = 7.968, p = .006, ε 2 = .06. No other group differences were observed. Discussion: Structural features of discourse production may serve as potential markers of cognitive communication deficits in mTBI. Furthermore, PTSD may contribute to verbal fluency deficits in individuals with mTBI. Additional research is needed to develop discourse-related measures that are more sensitive to the effects of mTBI and PTSD.

Publisher

American Speech Language Hearing Association

Subject

Speech and Hearing,Linguistics and Language,Developmental and Educational Psychology,Otorhinolaryngology

Reference84 articles.

1. Adamovich, B. B. , & Henderson, J. A. (1992). SCATBI: Scales of Cognitive Ability for Traumatic Brain Injury. Pro-Ed.

2. American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic criteria from DSM-IV-TR.

3. Barrett, J. (1998). Old McDonald had an apartment house (2nd ed.). Atheneum.

4. Are trauma narratives unique and do they predict psychological adjustment?

5. Psychometric properties of the PTSD checklist (PCL)

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Communication and Psychosocial Outcomes 2-Years After Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: Development of a Prognostic Model;Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation;2023-11

2. Discourse Characteristics in Traumatic Brain Injury;Spoken Discourse Impairments in the Neurogenic Populations;2023

3. Assessing Discourse Ability in Adults with Traumatic Brain Injury;Spoken Discourse Impairments in the Neurogenic Populations;2023

4. Preliminary Procedures to Develop Storytelling-Based Assessment for Aging and Neurogenic Disorders;Communication Sciences & Disorders;2022-09-30

5. Introduction to the 2020 Clinical Aphasiology Conference Forum;American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology;2022-01-18

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3