Affiliation:
1. VA Medical Center, Long Beach, California, and University of California, Irvine
Abstract
The purpose of this investigation was to determine the effects of stimulus phase on the latencies and morphology of the auditory brainstem response (ABR) of normal-hearing subjects. Although click stimuli produced equivalent ABR latencies for the rarefaction and condensation phases, the subtraction of the waveforms from the two phases yielded a difference potential. Tone pip stimuli produced polarity differences that were inversely related to stimulus frequency: the higher the frequency, the smaller the ABR latency differences between responses to rarefaction and condensation stimuli, and the smaller the difference potentials. Thus, whereas the latency of click-evoked ABR is dominated by high-frequency responses with equivalent latencies regardless of stimulus phase, low-frequency responses contribute to the overall morphology of the ABR that yields the phasic difference potential. The implications of these findings are discussed with reference to subjects with high-frequency hearing losses.
Publisher
American Speech Language Hearing Association
Subject
Speech and Hearing,Linguistics and Language,Language and Linguistics
Reference35 articles.
1. American National Standards Institute 1989 American National Standards specifications for audiometers
2. Interaction of click polarity, stimulus level, and repetition rate on the auditory brainstem response;Beattie R. C;Scandinavian Audiology,1988
3. Brainstem response (ABR) to rarefaction and condensation clicks in normal hearing and steep high-frequency hearing loss;Borg E;Scandinavian Audiology, Supplement,1981
4. Auditory brainstem response (ABR) to rarefaction and condensation clicks in normal and abnormal ears;Borg E;Scandinavian Audiology,1982
Cited by
13 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献