Teleaudiology Services in Australia: A National Survey of Hearing Health Care Consumers Amid the COVID-19 Pandemic

Author:

Kelsall-Foreman India12ORCID,Bacusmo Eloise Anne Z.12ORCID,Barr Caitlin3ORCID,Vitkovic Jessica3ORCID,Campbell Elissa4,Coles Tony4,Paton Mark5,Penno Kathryn6,Bennett Rebecca J.127ORCID

Affiliation:

1. University of Western Australia, Crawley, Australia

2. Department of Brain and Hearing, Ear Science Institute Australia, Subiaco, Western Australia

3. Soundfair Australia Ltd., Melbourne, Victoria

4. Audiology Australia, Cremorne, Victoria

5. Australian College of Audiology, Spring Hill, Queensland, Australia

6. Hearing Collective, Como, Western Australia, Australia

7. Audiological Sciences, National Acoustic Laboratories, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to investigate the perspectives of Australia-based hearing health care consumers regarding the (a) provision and utilization of teleaudiology services, (b) experiences with teleaudiology, and (c) barriers and enablers to future teleaudiology use. Method: A national prospective self-report online survey was completed between April and October 2020, amid COVID-19. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics (closed-answer items) and content analysis (open-text responses). A total of 381 participants ( M age = 72.07 years ± 10.08, 142 females) were recruited from different states and territories of Australia. Results: Despite positive outcomes reported by those who undertook teleaudiology appointments during COVID-19, results indicate low-consumer teleaudiology uptake. It can be inferred that consumers were not aware of teleaudiology as an appointment option, clinicians/clinic staff had not informed and/or supported teleaudiology as an option, and biases existed that prevented teleaudiology being more widely adopted. It is unclear whether consumers who were eligible for government subsidies understood that teleaudiology appointments were reimbursed through government funding. Barriers to future teleaudiology uptake were largely related to concerns regarding confidentiality and privacy. Conclusion: Low consumer uptake of teleaudiology appointments appears to be driven by consumer preference for in-person services, which appears to be driven by lack of knowledge regarding the availability and effectiveness of teleaudiology. Supplemental Material: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.25619808

Publisher

American Speech Language Hearing Association

Reference38 articles.

1. Telehealth tinnitus therapy during the COVID-19 outbreak in the UK: uptake and related factors

2. Feasibility of using tele-audiology in the Canadian marketplace as an alternative to live appointments for follow-up services;Alexander M.;Canadian Audiologist,2020

3. Audiology Australia. (2022). Australian teleaudiology guidelines. https://teleaudiologyguidelines.org.au/teleaudiology-guidelines/

4. Barriers and facilitators to tele-audiology service delivery in Australia during the COVID-19 pandemic: perspectives of hearing healthcare clinicians

5. Utilisation of tele-audiology practices in Australia during the COVID-19 pandemic: Perspectives of audiology clinic owners, managers and reception staff;Bennett R. J.;International Journal of Audiology,2022

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3