Contemporary trends in scientific research and their influence on the categorical apparatus of jurisprudence

Author:

Bobrova N. A.1

Affiliation:

1. Togliatti State University

Abstract

The subject of the article is trends in Russian legal science.The aim of the article is to analyze and systematize the facts accumulating in legal sciences and science studies, which develop into trends that negatively affect the state of scientific jurisprudence, its categorical apparatus and practical significance, including for lawmaking and law enforcement.Methodology. The author uses historical, sociological, formal-legal, systemic and comparative methods.The main results. The following trends have been studied: substitution of the relevance and novelty of the topic with considerations of political conjuncture, scientific fashion and other pseudo-scientific considerations; Constitutional reforms as a new round of constitutionalization in the aspect of correlation between constitutionalization and interdisciplinarity of legal sciences; the danger of escalating the interdisciplinarity of legal research into the erosion of its subject; methodological eclecticism; weighting of scientific language, negligence and incorrect use of certain legal terms; misuse of foreign terminology; disunity of science and practice of law enforcement.Conclusions. Since the degree of practical implementation of scientific and legal research into legislative and law enforcement practice is too low, a more effective mechanism for analyzing and implementing specific proposals from legal scientists is needed.

Publisher

Dostoevsky Omsk State University

Reference32 articles.

1. Blokhina N.A., Vlasova M.A. Responsibility of the President and the Prosecutor's Office for the integrity and security of the state. Pravoprimenenie = Law Enforcement Review, 2021, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 86–98. DOI: 10.52468/2542-1514.2021.5(2).86-98. (In Russ.).

2. Kondrashev A.A. Constitutional amendments – 2020: on collisions and defects that give rise to unavoidable conflicts between the "eternal" chapters and chapters 3-8 of the Constitution of Russia. Konstitutsionnoe i munitsipal’noe pravo = Constitutional and Municipal Law, 2021, no. 3, pp. 28–29. (In Russ.).

3. Postnikov A.E. The Constitutional Model of the Political System of Russia in the Context of the Development of the "Digital Society". Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava = Journal of Russian Law, 2020, no. 5, pp. 38–49. (In Russ.).

4. Ivanova K.A., Nemchinova E.V. Transformation of the right to freedom of speech on the Internet as a tool for the development of democracy. Vestnik Universiteta im. O.E. Kutafina. Vektor yuridicheskoi nauki = Bulletin of the University named after O.E. Kutafin. Vector of legal science, 2019, no. 9, pp. 134–139. (In Russ.).

5. Komarova V.V. Real and imaginary expansion of the limits of constitutional law. Aktual’nye problemy rossiiskogo prava = Actual problems of Russian law, 2018, no. 10, pp. 11–23. (In Russ.).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3