Affiliation:
1. Department of Computer Science, Paderborn University, Germany
2. Department of Computer Science, Virginia Commonwealth University, USA
3. Department of Computer Science, The University of Texas at Austin, USA
Abstract
An important task in quantum physics is the estimation of local quantities for ground states of local Hamiltonians. Recently, [Ambainis, CCC 2014] defined the complexity class PQMA[log], and motivated its study by showing that the physical task of estimating the expectation value of a local observable against the ground state of a local Hamiltonian is PQMA[log]-complete. In this paper, we continue the study of PQMA[log], obtaining the following lower and upper bounds.Lower bounds (hardness results): - The PQMA[log]-completeness result of [Ambainis, CCC 2014] requires O(logn)-local observables and Hamiltonians. We show that simulating even a single qubit measurement on ground states of 5-local Hamiltonians is PQMA[log]-complete, resolving an open question of Ambainis.- We formalize the complexity theoretic study of estimating two-point correlation functions against ground states, and show that this task is similarly PQMA[log]-complete. - We identify a flaw in [Ambainis, CCC 2014] regarding a PUQMA[log]-hardness proof for estimating spectral gaps of local Hamiltonians. By introducing a ``query validation'' technique, we build on [Ambainis, CCC 2014] to obtain PUQMA[log]-hardness for estimating spectral gaps under polynomial-time Turing reductions. Upper bounds (containment in complexity classes): - PQMA[log] is thought of as ``slightly harder'' than QMA. We justify this formally by exploiting the hierarchical voting technique of [Beigel, Hemachandra, Wechsung, SCT 1989] to show PQMA[log]⊆PP. This improves the containment QMA⊆PP [Kitaev, Watrous, STOC 2000]. This work contributes a rigorous treatment of the subtlety involved in studying oracle classes in which the oracle solves a promise problem. This is particularly relevant for quantum complexity theory, where most natural classes such as BQP and QMA are defined as promise classes.
Publisher
Verein zur Forderung des Open Access Publizierens in den Quantenwissenschaften
Subject
Physics and Astronomy (miscellaneous),Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
Reference63 articles.
1. S. Aaronson. BQP and the polynomial hierarchy. In Proceedings of the 42nd ACM Symposium on the Theory of Computing (STOC 2010), pages 141–150, 2010. 10.1145/1806689.1806711.
2. D. Aharonov and T. Naveh. Quantum NP - A survey. Available at arXiv:quant-ph/0210077v1, 2002.
3. D. Aharonov and L. Zhou. Hamiltonian sparsification and gap-simulations. In Avrim Blum, editor, 10th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS), volume 124 of Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), pages 2:1–2:21. Dagstuhl Publishing, 2018. 10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2019.2.
4. D. Aharonov, M. Ben-Or, F. Brandão, and O. Sattath. The pursuit for uniqueness: Extending Valiant-Vazirani theorem to the probabilistic and quantum settings. Available at arXiv:0810.4840v1 [quant-ph], 2008.
5. A. Ambainis. On physical problems that are slightly more difficult than QMA. In Proceedings of 29th IEEE Conference on Computational Complexity (CCC), pages 32–43, 2014. 10.1109/ccc.2014.12.
Cited by
10 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献