Classically Replaceable Operations
Author:
Liu Guoding1ORCID, Zhang Xingjian1ORCID, Ma Xiongfeng1ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Center for Quantum Information, Institute for Interdisciplinary Information Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084 China
Abstract
Quantum information science provides powerful technologies beyond the scope of classical physics. In practice, accurate control of quantum operations is a challenging task with current quantum devices. The implementation of high fidelity and multi-qubit quantum operations consumes massive resources and requires complicated hardware design to fight against noise. An approach to alleviating this problem is to replace quantum operations with classical processing. Despite the common practice of this approach, rigorous criteria to determine whether a given quantum operation is replaceable classically are still missing. In this work, we define the classically replaceable operations in four general scenarios. In each scenario, we provide their necessary and sufficient criteria and point out the corresponding classical processing. For a practically favorable case of unitary classically replaceable operations, we show that the replaced classical processing is deterministic. Beyond that, we regard the irreplaceability of quantum operations by classical processing as a quantum resource and relate it to the performance of a channel in a non-local game, as manifested in a robustness measure.
Funder
National Natural Science Foundation of China National Key Research and Development Program of China
Publisher
Verein zur Forderung des Open Access Publizierens in den Quantenwissenschaften
Subject
Physics and Astronomy (miscellaneous),Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
Reference41 articles.
1. C. H. Bennett and G. Brassard, in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computers, Systems and Signal Processing (IEEE Press, New York, 1984), pp. 175–179, URL https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcs.2014.05.025. 2. A. K. Ekert, Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 661 (1991), URL http://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.67.661. 3. F. Arute, K. Arya, R. Babbush, D. Bacon, J. C. Bardin, R. Barends, R. Biswas, S. Boixo, F. G. S. L. Brandao, D. A. Buell, et al., Nature 574, 505 (2019), ISSN 1476-4687, URL https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1666-5. 4. H.-S. Zhong, H. Wang, Y.-H. Deng, M.-C. Chen, L.-C. Peng, Y.-H. Luo, J. Qin, D. Wu, X. Ding, Y. Hu, et al., Science 370, 1460 (2020), URL https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abe8770. 5. Y. Wu, W.-S. Bao, S. Cao, F. Chen, M.-C. Chen, X. Chen, T.-H. Chung, H. Deng, Y. Du, D. Fan, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 180501 (2021), URL https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.180501.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|