Does the Degree Matter? MD and DO Students Who Match Into OB/GYN Report Different Experiences in US Undergraduate Medical Education

Author:

Cai Fei1ORCID,Santiago Sarah2,Southworth Elizabeth3ORCID,Stephenson-Famy Alyssa4ORCID,Fay Emily5ORCID,Wang Eileen Y.6ORCID,Burns R. Nicholas7

Affiliation:

1. Fei Cai, MD, is a PGY-7 Maternal Fetal Medicine Fellow, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania

2. Sarah Santiago, MD, is a PGY-3 Obstetrics and Gynecology Resident, University of Michigan

3. Elizabeth Southworth, MD, is a PGY-3 Obstetrics and Gynecology Resident, University of Michigan

4. Alyssa Stephenson-Famy, MD, is Associate Professor of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Associate Residency Program Director, Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, University of Washington Medical Center

5. Emily Fay, MD, is Assistant Professor of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, University of Washington Medical Center

6. Eileen Y. Wang, MD, is Clinical Professor of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania; and

7. R. Nicholas Burns, MD, is a PGY-7 Maternal Fetal Medicine Fellow; University of Washington Medical Center

Abstract

Background Although allopathic (MD) and osteopathic (DO) students have similar curricular requirements, little is known about differences in MD and DO preparedness for obstetrics and gynecology (OB/GYN) residency. Objective To assess differences in experiences and confidence of MD vs DO students who matched to OB/GYN. Methods This cross-sectional survey study was open to all fourth-year medical students who matched to OB/GYN in the United States in April 2021. The survey included demographic data, clinical experiences, confidence (5-point sliding scale), and a 11-item knowledge test. Survey responses were compared to assess for disparities in experiences and confidence. Results Survey response rate was 72.0% (1057 of 1469) students matched to OB/GYN postgraduate year 1 positions. Of the 871 MD and 175 DO responding students, MDs were more likely to have clerkships ≥6 weeks (78.1% vs 15.4%; P<.001) and a home sub-internship (92.0% vs 53.4%; P<.001). DOs reported more hands-on experiences with procedures (MD median=35 [20-35] vs DO median=40 [25-65]; P=.002). There was no difference in self-reported confidence in knowledge, technical skills, or having a realistic sense of internship, and no difference in baseline knowledge test scores. DOs felt less confident about their medical school preparation (aOR 0.40; 95% CI 0.25-0.66; P<.001) and were more likely to perceive inequity of residency preparation (aOR 1.88; 95% CI 1.18-3.00; P=.002). Conclusions MD students matched to US OB/GYN residency programs reported longer clerkship and more home sub-internships, while DO students reported more hands-on experiences. Despite reporting similar confidence in knowledge and skills, DO students felt less prepared for internship.

Publisher

Journal of Graduate Medical Education

Subject

General Medicine,Education

Reference20 articles.

1. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. Executive summary of the agreement among ACGME, AOA, and AACOM. Published September 26, 2014. Accessed June 20, 2022. https://www.acgme.org/globalassets/PDFs/Nasca-Community/Executive_Summary_of_the_Agreement_between_ACGME_and_AOA.pdf

2. Association of American Medical Colleges. Medical schools. Accessed June 20, 2022. https://web.archive.org/web/20130812102623/https://www.aamc.org/about/medicalschools

3. American Association of Colleges of Osteopathic Medicine. U.S. colleges of osteopathic medicine. Accessed June 20, 2022. https://www.aacom.org/become-a-doctor/prepare-for-medical-school/us-colleges-of-osteopathic-medicine

4. National Resident Matching Program. Results and data 2021 Main Residency Match. Accessed June 20, 2022. https://www.nrmp.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/MRM-Results_and-Data_2021.pdf

5. National Resident Matching Program. Results and data 2022 Main Residency Match. Accessed June 20, 2022. https://www.nrmp.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/2022-Main-Match-Results-and-Data_Final.pdf

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3