Media Control in the Digital Politics of Indonesia

Author:

Masduki

Abstract

In transitional democratic countries with significant digital media user bases, the “authoritarian turn in digital media” has resulted in new forms of media control designed to counter critical media exposure. This article investigates the ongoing digital pressures experienced by Indonesian media organizations and investigative journalists by the partisan supporters of the country’s new authoritarian political leaders. This article provides a critical review of the forms of media control that have emerged in Indonesia within the past five years (2015–2020), giving special attention to the doxing allegedly faced by several news media and journalistic projects: IndonesiaLeaks; <em>Tempo </em>magazine; and WatchDoc. Applying qualitative methods (observation, semi-structured interviews, review of documents), this study finds that the rise of non-state and societal control over critical media leads to self-censorship amongst media and journalists. This study shows that online trolls, doxing, and hyper-partisan news outlets are used as new forms of media control. Control is also exerted by paid-social media buzzers, whose online identity is established by their use of digital and social media platforms to manipulate information and counter critical news regarding incumbent and oppositional political leaders. This article contributes to the academic debate on the intended forms of media control in digital politics of transitional democracies.

Publisher

Cogitatio

Subject

Communication

Reference59 articles.

1. Anderson, C. W., Bell, E., & Shirky, C. (2012). Post-industrial journalism: Adapting to the present—A report. Columbia Journalism School.

2. Arianto, B. (2020). Salah kaprah ihwal buzzer: Analisis percakapan warganet di media sosial [An analysis of citizen conversation in social media]. Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pemerintahan, 5(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.14710/jiip.v5i1.7287

3. Atal, M. (2017). Competing forms of media capture in developing democracies. In A. Schiffrin (Eds.), In the service of power: Media capture and the threat to democracy (pp. 19–31). CIMA.

4. Bicer, C. (2020). The power and politics in organizations. In U. Ucan (Eds.), Discussions between economic agents-socio economic studies (pp. 221–245). Iksad Publications.

5. Bradshaw, S., & Howard, P. (2019). The global disinformation order: 2019 global inventory of organized social media manipulation. Oxford Internet Institute.

Cited by 6 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3