Abstract
Across Western Europe, progressive issues take centre stage within integration debates and discourse. This article addresses the paradox middle‐class progressives get caught up in when arguing for openness towards diversity, while also expecting adaptation to the progressive “modern” norm on sexuality, especially from Muslim Others. Going beyond existing literature, this article demonstrates the understudied manifestations of this paradox in everyday life, within a diverse majority–minority primary school context in Amsterdam. Taking sex education as a case, the authors reveal three different approaches—confrontational, continued discussion, and compromise—with which middle‐class parents without a migration background negotiate difference, each emphasizing different aspects of the paradox. The results show how, despite being a local numerical minority, progressive parents still enact their power position at large arguing for (gradual) adaptation to “modernity.” However, some parents provide solutions to difference that move away from consensus and envision a future that allows for multiple norms to exist.
Reference29 articles.
1. Bartelink, B., & Knibbe, K. E. (2022). Why the Dutch (think they) break taboos: Challenging contemporary presentations of the role of religious actors in narratives of sexual liberation. New Diversities, 24(2), 13–28.
2. Bartelink, B., & Wiering, J. (2020). Speaking the body: Examining the intersections of sexuality, secularity and religion in Dutch sexuality education. In S.-J. Page & K. Pilcher (Eds.), Embodying religion, gender and sexuality (pp. 76–92). Routledge.
3. Bertossi, C., Duyvendak, J. W., & Foner, N. (2021). Past in the present: Migration and the uses of history in the contemporary era. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 47(18), 4155–4171.
4. Boterman, W. R. (2013). Dealing with diversity: Middle-class family households and the issue of ‘Black’ and ‘White’ schools in Amsterdam. Urban Studies, 50(6), 1130–1147.
5. Butler, J. (2008). Sexual politics, torture, and secular time. British Journal of Sociology, 59(1), 1–23.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献