What Do You Expect? Linguistic Reflections on Empathy in Science Communication

Author:

Janich Nina

Abstract

This linguistics article, which draws additionally on interdisciplinary insights, discusses whether and to what extent more empathy could facilitate and promote the exchange of knowledge between science and society. The existence of the Internet as a knowledge resource has made it necessary, especially in online communication, to renegotiate (scientific) expertise and roles such as ‘expert’ and ‘layperson.’ A discourse linguistics case study of a science blog shows that these negotiations quickly take on the character of an emotionally charged relationship between writer and respondent and are by no means limited to the level of fact or disinterested scholarly debate. The reason for this—so this article argues—is that reciprocal expectations and expectations of expectations play an essential role in science communication, as in any social communication. This hypothesis is supported by an analysis of interviews with scientists about their expectations of the public’s understanding of science. Against this background, empathy seems to be a suitable means to better meet the expectations of one’s interlocuter (or at least to avoid disappointed expectations) and to move from a more emotional level back to a more rational one. Empathy and its role in science communication should therefore be investigated more closely—on an interdisciplinary basis.

Publisher

Cogitatio

Subject

Communication

Reference24 articles.

1. Beckers, K. (2012). Kommunikation und Kommunizierbarkeit von Wissen: Prinzipien und Strategien kooperativer Wissenskonstruktion [Communication and communicability of knowledge: Principles and strategies of cooperative knowledge construction]. Berlin: Schmidt.

2. Bender, M., & Janich, N. (2020). Empathie in der Wissenschaftskommunikation: Eine Forschungsskizze [Empathy in science communication: A research sketch]. In K. Jakob, P. Konerding, & W.-A. Liebert (Eds.), Sprache und Empathie: Linguistische und interdisziplinäre Zugänge [Language and empathy: Linguistic and interdisciplinary approaches] (pp. 425–449). Berlin and New York, NY: De Gruyter.

3. Breithaupt, F. (2009). Kulturen der empathie [Cultures of empathy]. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

4. Breyer, T. (2013). Empathie und ihre Grenzen: Diskursive Vielfalt—Phänomenale Einheit? [Empathy and its limitations: Discursive diversity—Phenomenal entity?]. In T. Breyer (Ed.), Philosophische, psychologische und anthropologische Perspektiven [Philosophical, psychological and anthropological perspectives] (pp. 13–44). Munich: Fink.

5. Brossard, D., & Scheufele, D. A. (2013). Science, new media, and the public. Science, 339(6115), 40–41.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3