Abstract
Doing justice to their families and the political mandate is especially difficult for MEPs. Parents struggle to balance family obligations and work, particularly when the children are young. They undertake extensive journeys between their home constituencies and Brussels or Strasbourg. This taxing routine is further compounded by prolonged working hours, often devoid of leisurely weekends. In combination with the absence of a comprehensive parental leave policy, these challenges disproportionately affect parents of young children, particularly mothers, influencing the diversity and representation within the European Parliament. This study critically examines the existing conditions that shape the working environment of MEPs who are parents. It explores recent endeavors to reform these conditions and the underlying obstacles that hinder the progress of these reformative initiatives. Referring to relevant documents, this study first outlines formal regulations governing parental rights in the European Parliament. We then address informal rules and recent reform proposals using insight from MEP interviews. This examination investigates how parent MEPs assess working conditions and balance competing demands. Despite expectations, the European Parliament falls short of being as family-friendly as anticipated. Nevertheless, recent times have witnessed increased attention to the topic and various reform proposals. The obstacles posed by diverse national legacies and variant conceptions of MEP mandates and statuses for reform are highlighted.
Reference35 articles.
1. Bonewit, A. (2016). Preparing a harmonized maternity leave for Members of the European Parliament—Legal analysis. European Parliament. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/IDAN/2016/556937/IPOL_IDA%282016%29556937_EN.pdf
2. Bryant, L. A., & Marin Hellwege, J. (2019). Working mothers represent: How children affect the legislative agenda of women in congress. American Politics Research, 47(3), 447–470.
3. Campbell, R., & Childs, S. (2014). Parents in parliament: “Where’s mum?.” The Political Quarterly, 85(4), 487–492.
4. Chappell, L., & Mackay, F. (2017). “What’s in a name? Mapping the terrain of informal institutions and gender politics.” In G. Waylen (Ed.), Gender and informal institutions (pp. 23–44). Rowman & Littlefield International.
5. Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, 2000, 2000/C 364/01.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献