Abstract
The slogan “digital first” has become a buzzword for public organisational development at the local, regional, and national levels in Sweden. The slogan alludes to the idea that providing information to and communication with citizens should take place primarily through digital channels. This idea is also popular in other parts of the digitalised world. Obviously, digital solutions have the potential to become pedagogical, reliable, and effective interfaces for governmental interaction with citizens. However, the extent to which they are actually accessible, brought to use, and valued among older adult users (more than 65 years of age) has not attracted much research interest. Drawing on national survey data, collected in November–December 2020, on Swedish citizens (aged 65 to 90 years), this article will start to compensate for this deficit. First, it analyses the extent to which citizens have physical access to required devices and how access is related to material, discursive, and social resources. Second, it analyses resources and usage of important platforms for public services for older adults: the Pensions Agency, health care, e-pharmacy, the Social Insurance Agency, and the Tax Agency. Finally, the article examines outcomes: feelings and attitudes towards experiences of encountering a digitalising society. The article demonstrates how all three levels of divides—access, usage, and outcomes—are clearly related to older adults’ access to material, discursive, and social resources, as well as to age and pre-retirement experience with computers. It is comparatively younger individuals with longer formal education and at least average incomes and social networks who benefit the most from digitalised public services.
Reference34 articles.
1. Baudin, K., Gustafsson, C., & Frennert, S. (2020). Ongoing digital transformation: A cross-sectional study on the views of Swedish elder care personnel. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 22(6), Article e15450. https://doi.org/10.2196/15450
2. Digg. (2022). Digitalt som förstahandsval [Digital by default]. https://www.digg.se/kunskap-och-stod/svenskt-ramverk-for-digital-samverkan/rekommendationer-for-offentliga-organisationer/det-digitala-motet
3. Ebbers, W. E., Jansen, M. G., & van Deursen, A. J. (2016). Impact of the digital divide on e-government: Expanding from channel choice to channel usage. Government Information Quarterly, 33(4), 685–692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2016.08.007
4. European Commission. (2022). Digital economy and society index (DESI).
5. Friemel, T. (2016). The digital divide has grown old. New Media & Society, 18(2), 313–331. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814538648
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献