Abstract
To the growing literature on non-resident citizens’ special representation, we contribute with a systematic examination of the role of descriptive representation of citizens living abroad in elections for extraterritorial districts. Using data for the 308 candidacy observations in three two-seat extraterritorial districts in five legislative elections held between 2007 and 2021 in Ecuador, for a total of 30 seats, we test four hypotheses related to the electoral rules, party-level, and socio-demographic factors of non-resident candidates. Ecuadorian non-resident candidates benefit from their incumbency position and party affiliation, along with left-wing ideological ascription and belonging to party organizations that pushed for voting rights abroad and that manifest an interest in emigrant issues. This article contributes to showing what gets emigrants elected in extraterritorial seats and offers a within-country comparison connecting elections with legislative politics across national borders.
Subject
Public Administration,Sociology and Political Science
Reference70 articles.
1. Abad, A., Aldaz Peña, R., Dávila Gordillo, D., & Vallejo Vera, S. (2022). An unwelcomed deja-vu: Ecuadorian politics in 2021. Revista de Ciencia Política, 42(2), 281–308.
2. Alesina, A., & Rosenthal, H. (1995). Partisan politics, divided government and the economy. Cambridge University Press.
3. André, A., & Depauw, S. (2013). District magnitude and home styles of representation in European democracies. West European Politics, 36(5), 986–1006.
4. Basabe-Serrano, S. (2018). Carreras legislativas discretas en contextos de débil institucionalización partidista: Propuesta teórica y evidencia empírica aplicada a la legislatura de Ecuador, 1979–2007. Revista de Ciencia Política, 38(1), 1–23.
5. Bauböck, R. (2007). Stakeholder citizenship and transnational political participation: A normative evaluation of external voting. Fordham Law Review, 75(5), 2393–2447.