COVID-19 Future Predictions Using 4 Supervised Machine Learning Models
-
Published:2022-01-07
Issue:
Volume:
Page:61-66
-
ISSN:2581-9429
-
Container-title:International Journal of Advanced Research in Science, Communication and Technology
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:IJARSCT
Author:
Vadhavkar Aditi1, Thombare Pratiksha1, Bhalerao Priyanka1, Auti Utkarsha1
Affiliation:
1. D. Y. Patil Institute of Engineering & Technology, Pune, Maharashtra, India
Abstract
Forecasting Mechanisms like Machine Learning (ML) models having been proving their significance to anticipate perioperative outcomes in the domain of decision making on the future course of actions. Many application domains have witnessed the use of ML models for identification and prioritization of adverse factors for a threat. The spread of COVID-19 has proven to be a great threat to a mankind announcing it a worldwide pandemic throughout. Many assets throughout the world has faced enormous infectivity and contagiousness of this illness. To look at the figure of undermining components of COVID-19 we’ve specifically used four Machine Learning Models Linear Regression (LR), Least shrinkage and determination administrator (LASSO), Support vector machine (SVM) and Exponential smoothing (ES). The results depict that the ES performs best among the four models employed in this study, followed by LR and LASSO which performs well in forecasting the newly confirmed cases, death rates yet recovery rates, but SVM performs poorly all told the prediction scenarios given the available dataset.
Publisher
Naksh Solutions
Reference11 articles.
1. G. Bontempi, S. B. Taieb, and Y.-A. Le Borgne, “Machine learning strategies for time series forecasting,” in Proc. Eur. Bus. Intell. Summer School. Berlin, Germany: Springer, 2012, pp. 62–77. 2. F. E. Harrell Jr, K. L. Lee, D. B. Matchar, and T. A. Reichert, “Regression models for prognostic prediction: Advantages, problems, and suggested solutions,” Cancer Treat. Rep., vol. 69, no. 10, pp. 1071–1077, 1985. 3. P. Lapuerta, S. P. Azen, and L. Labree, “Use of neural networks in predicting the risk of coronary artery disease,” Comput. Biomed. Res., vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 38–52, Feb. 1995. 4. K. M. Anderson, P. M. Odell, P. W. Wilson, and W. B. Kannel, “Cardiovascular disease risk profiles,” Amer. heart J., vol. 121, no. 1, pp. 293–298, 1991. 5. F. Petropoulos and S. Makridakis, “Forecasting the novel coronavirus COVID 19,” PLoS ONE, vol. 15, no. 3, Mar. 2020, Art. no. e0231236.
|
|