Affiliation:
1. Guangzhou Municipal Construction Group Co., Ltd., Guangzhou, 5100305 China
2. Guangzhou University, Guangzhou, 510006,China
Abstract
Under the green building policy, the recycling of construction waste has become an important issue. However, many obstructions in the industrial chain of construction waste recycling, slow integration of production elements in the chain, and inefficient resource allocation hinder the development of the construction waste recycling industry. In this study, a co-evolution model of the industrial chain of construction waste recycling is constructed based on the Lotka–Volterra model, and the Jacobian matrix is used for stability analysis. Finally, a numerical simulation is performed. The simulation results indicate that: (1) There is a high product correlation between upstream and downstream enterprises in the industrial chain of construction waste recycling; (2) The conversion coefficient of supply and demand of upstream and downstream enterprises has a higher impact on and is more sensitive to the evolution of this industrial chain; (3) The co-evolution of upstream and downstream enterprises promotes the added value of products and maximizes the overall benefits of the industrial chain, which provides reference value and theoretical basis for the development of the industrial chain of construction waste recycling.
Publisher
North Atlantic University Union (NAUN)
Subject
Electrical and Electronic Engineering,Signal Processing
Reference38 articles.
1. J. K. Liu., Y. Q Yi, and X. T.Wang, “Exploring factors influencing construction waste reduction: A structural equation modeling approach,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol 276, pp. 123185, July 2020
2. J. R. Li, Y. Yao, J. Zuo, and J. G. Li, “Key policies to the development of construction and demolition waste recycling industry in China,” Waste Management, vol 108, pp. 137-143, May 2020
3. S. O. Ajayi and L. O. Oyedele, “Policy imperatives for diverting construction waste from landfill: experts’ recommendations for UK policy expansion,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol 147, pp. 57-65, Jan. 2017
4. European Union, Construction and demolition waste (C&DW)-2016. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/environment/waste/construction_ demolition.htm (accessed 25 April 2017).
5. J. L. Galvez-Martos, D. Styles, H. Schoenberger, and B. Zeschmar-Lahl, “Construction and demolition waste best management practice in Europe,” Resources, Conservation & Recycling, vol 136, pp.166-178, Sept. 2018.