Barriers and enablers of the use of digital technologies for sustainable agricultural development and food security
Author:
Sidibé Amadou1ORCID, Olabisi Laura Schmitt2, Doumbia Hawa1, Touré Kadiatou1, Niamba Cris Auguste1
Affiliation:
1. Intitut Polytechnique Rural de Formation et Recherche Appliquée (IPR/IFRA), Katibougou, Koulikoro, Mali 2. Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA
Abstract
Digitization in agriculture is gaining momentum in developing countries. Digital technology aims to improve linkages along the agriculture value chain, thereby enabling farming communities and systems to recover from stresses and to absorb shocks to which farmers are exposed. However, there is the concern that digital technologies have not benefited the agricultural sector in a sustainable way. Stakeholders along the agriculture value chain need significant amounts of information to which they do not have access. In Mali, smartphones and earth observation data are used to support the development of land tenure information services and to improve agriculture statistics. To multiply business opportunities, the scope of the use of these technologies is being expanded to include agronomic advisory next-gen, franchised farm extension services. This article aims to evaluate these initiatives to further understand the way digitization could contribute to sustainable agricultural development and food security. In addition, it aims to determine how effective these technologies are under different conditions and how they can contribute to better sustainable development outcomes. Most evaluation studies of agriculture technology place emphasis on the economic aspects of productivity, profitability, and technical efficiency of the technology and the implications for users’ livelihoods. This study considers technology as a socio-technical phenomenon to understand the underlying processes that may enable or constrain the takeoff and the sustainability of technology. Furthermore, understanding these processes provides valuable theoretical and methodological insights to stakeholders for necessary adjustments of technology to given biophysical, socioeconomic, cultural, and cognitive conditions.
Publisher
University of California Press
Subject
Atmospheric Science,Geology,Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology,Ecology,Environmental Engineering,Oceanography
Reference49 articles.
1. Akinseye, FM, Agele, SO, Traoré, PCS, Adam, M, Whitbread, AM. 2016. Evaluation of the onset and length of growing season to define planting date—“A case study for Mali (West Africa).”Theoretical and Applied Climatology124: 973–983. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00704-015-1460-8. 2. Baumüller, H. 2012. Facilitating agricultural technology adoption among the poor: The role of service delivery through mobile phones. SSRN Journal. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2237987. 3. Berkhout, E, Glover, D. 2011. The evolution of the system of rice intensification as a socio-technical phenomenon: A report to the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. SSRN Journal. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1922760. 4. Biernacki, P, Waldorf, D. 1981. Snowball sampling: Problems and techniques of chain referral sampling. Sociological Methods & Research10: 141–163. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/004912418101000205. 5. Blaes, X, Traoré, PCS, Schut, AGT, Ajeigbe, HA, Chomé, G, Boekelo, B, Diancoumba, M, Goita, K, Inuwa, AH, Zurita-Milla, R. 2015. STARS-ISABELA 2014–2015, Field Data Collection Protocol (Version 10, June 2015), Project Report. Available athttp://refhub.elsevier.com/S0378-4290(17)31016-X/sbref0010.
Cited by
10 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|