A Donor Influenced by Local Dynamics

Author:

Matsuzawa Setsuko1

Affiliation:

1. The College of Wooster, smatsuzawa@wooster.edu

Abstract

This article explores the relations between a foreign aid donor and local actors in the context of the dissemination of development discourses and practices in an authoritarian context. It addresses the question “To what extent may the local dynamics alter the original goals of a donor and lead to unintended consequences?” Based on archival research, interviews, and secondary literature, this case study examines the Yunnan Uplands Management Project (YUM) in 1990–95, the Ford Foundation's first grant program on rural poverty alleviation in China. While the Foundation did not attain its main goal of making YUM a national model for poverty alleviation, the local actors were able to use YUM to develop individual capacities and to build roles for themselves as development actors in the form of associations and nongovernmental organizations, resulting in further support from the Foundation. The study contributes to our understanding of donor-local actor dynamics by highlighting the gaps between the original goals of a donor and the perspectives and motivations of local actors. The study suggests that local dynamics may influence the goals of donors and the ways they seek to disseminate development discourses and practices to local actors, despite the common conception of donors as hegemonic or culturally imperialistic.

Publisher

University of California Press

Subject

Development

Reference91 articles.

1. Aksartova, Sada. 2009. “Promoting Civil Society or Diffusing NGOs: U.S. Donors in the Former Soviet Union.” Pp.160–91 in Globalization, Philanthropy, and Civil Society: Projecting Institutional Logics Abroad, edited by David C. Hammack and Steven Heydemann. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

2. Alliband, Terry. 1983. Catalysts of Development: Voluntary Agencies in India. West Hartford, CT: Kumarian Press.

3. Arnove, Robert F. 1980. “Foundations and the Transfer of Knowledge.” Pp. 305–30 in Philanthropy and Cultural Imperialism: The Foundations at Home and Abroad, edited by Robert F. Arnove. Boston: G. K. Hall.

4. Arnove, Robert F., and Nadine Pinede. 2007. “Revisiting the ‘Big Three’ Foundations.”Critical Sociology33:389–425.

5. Bernstein, Thomas P. 2000. “Instability in Rural China.” Pp. 95–111 in Is China Unstable?, edited by David Shambaugh. New York: M. E. Sharpe.

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3