Affiliation:
1. Faculty of Dental Medicine, Medical University of Varna, 84 Tsar Osvoboditel Blvd, 9000 Varna, Bulgaria
2. Laboratory of Computer Simulations in Medicine, Technical University of Varna, 1 Studentska Str, 9010 Varna, Bulgaria
Abstract
Purpose: To compare the dimensions accuracy and surface roughness of polymeric dental
bridges produced by different 3D printers.
Design/methodology/approach: Four-part dental bridges were manufactured by three
printing systems working on the basis of digital light projection (DLP) stereolithography
(SLA), laser-assisted SLA and fused deposition modeling (FDM). The materials used from
SLA printers are liquid methacrylate photopolymer resins, while FDM printer use thin wire
plastic polylactic acid. The accuracy of the external dimensions of dental bridges was
evaluated and the surface roughness was measured.
Findings: It was found that compared to the base model, the dimensions of the SLA
printed bridges are bigger with 1.25%-6.21%, while the corresponding dimensions of the
samples, made by FDM are smaller by 1.07%-4.71%, regardless the position of the object
towards the substrate. The samples, produced by FDM, are characterized with the highest
roughness. The average roughness deviation (Ra) values for DLP SLA and lase-assisted SLA
are 2.40 μm and 2.97 μm, respectively.
Research limitations/implications: For production of high quality polymeric dental
constructions next research should be targeted to investigation of the polymerization
degree, stresses and deformations.
Practical implications: Our study shows that 3D printers, based on laser-assisted
and DLP SLA, can be successfully used for manufacturing of polymeric dental bridges –
temporary restorations or cast patterns, while FDM system is more suitable for training
models. The results will help the dentists to make right choice of the most suitable 3D printer.
Originality/value: One of the largest fixed partial dentures – four-part bridges, produced
by three different commercial 3D printing systems, were investigated by comparative
analysis. The paper will attract readers’ interest in the field of biomedical materials and
application of new technologies in dentistry.
Subject
General Materials Science
Cited by
52 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献