Affiliation:
1. Maria Curie Sklodowska University, Faculty of Economics
2. Narodowy Bank Polski
Abstract
The aim of the article is to identify the existence of a relationship between payment inclusion and the demand for cash and the impact of the behavioural factor, which is the uncertainty associated with a natural disaster (pandemic) on various streams of demand for cash. The authors formulated the following research hypotheses H1: Macroeconomic determinants in the form of the cost of money (represented by the interest rate) significantly affect the transaction demand for cash despite the increase in non-cash transactions with the use of funds in bank accounts. H2: Uncertainty as a behavioural factor affects the size of the demand for money, although this impact is more significant in the case of a demand of a precautionary nature than of a transaction nature. H3: The level of financial inclusion measured by the dissemination of non-cash transactions has a significant and negative impact on the transaction demand for cash. In order to verify them, the authors built a linear regression model. The obtained results of the study allowed to confirm the impact of uncertainty on the demand for cash. However, the impact of payment inclusion on the demand for cash was not confirmed in the study.
Reference58 articles.
1. Tobin J. (1958), Liquidity preference as behavior towards risk, Review of Economic Studies, 25, 65–86.
2. CEMLA (2016), The Role of Payment Systems and Services in Financial Inclusion, Center for Latin American Monetary Studies, https://econpapers.repec.org/bookchap/cmllibros/2e.htm.
3. Czarnecka M. (2018), Wykluczenie finansowe i integracja finansowa – aspekty terminologiczne, Kwartalnik Kolegium Ekonomiczno-Społecznego Studia i Prace, 1, 63–83, DOI: 10.33119 /KKESSiP.2018.1.4.
4. Fujiki H. (2020), Cash demand and financial literacy: a case study using Japanese survey data, Japan and the World, 54(C), DOI: 10.1016/j.japwor.2020.100998.
5. Columba F. (2009), Narrow money and transaction technology: new disaggregated evidence, Journal of Economics and Business, 61(4), 312–325, DOI: 10.1016/j.jeconbus.2009.01.001.