Next-generation immunomodulatory drugs in multiple myeloma
-
Published:2019-12-31
Issue:
Volume:73
Page:791-802
-
ISSN:0032-5449
-
Container-title:Postępy Higieny i Medycyny Doświadczalnej
-
language:
-
Short-container-title:Postepy Hig Med Dosw
Author:
Suska Anna1, Czerniuk Maciej Rafał2, Jurczyszyn Artur1
Affiliation:
1. Katedra Hematologii, Uniwersytet Jagielloński Collegium Medicum, Kraków 2. Zakład Chirurgii Stomatologicznej Warszawskiego Uniwersytetu Medycznego, Warszawa
Abstract
Multiple myeloma (MM) is a hematological malignancy that mainly affects elderly patients, with the median age of 69 years at the time of diagnosis. Despite the recent increase in the number of drugs used in the antimyeloma therapy, the disease remains incurable, with remissions and subsequent relapses. Immunomodulatory drugs (IMIDs), known to have multiple mechanisms of actions, including direct anti-MM activity and immune-stimulatory properties, are currently the backbone in multidrug regimens. New generation IMIDs are recommended nowoby
ESMO – lenalidomide is included in frontline therapy, while pomalidomide is accepted from
the third line. Clinical trials proved lack of apparent cross-resistance between immunomodulatory
agents, confirmed their high efficacy and acceptable safety profile in individuals with
relapsed multiple myeloma (RRMM) refractory to proteasome inhibitors and lenalidomide,
even with adverse cytogenetic abnormalities. Also, triplet pomalidomide-based combinations
with bortezomib, carfilzomib, cyclophosphamide, daratumumab or elotuzumab were proved
to be effective and safe in this group of patients. The most common adverse events of the new
generation IMIDs are the following: hematological toxicity (neutropenia, thrombocytopenia,
anemia), fatigue and, while administered with dexamethasone, infections. However, peripheral
neuropathy, significantly limiting the use of first generation IMID - thalidomide, is much less
frequently observed. Due to the increased risk of venous thromboembolism, thromboprophylaxis
should be implemented in the whole course of IMID therapy. Data from real-life settings
demonstrate that new generation IMIDs are a cost-effective treatment option in relapsed/
refractory myeloma. Currently, one drug program with the new IMIDs is available in Poland.
Publisher
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Subject
Infectious Diseases,Microbiology (medical)
Reference56 articles.
1. Ailawadhi S., Mikhael J.R., LaPlant B.R., Laumann K.M., KumarS., Roy V., Dingli D., Bergsagel P.L., Buadi F.K., Rajkumar S.V, FonsecaR., Gertz M.A., Kapoor P., Sher T., Hayman S.R. i wsp.: Pomalidomide-dexamethasone in refractory multiple myeloma: long--term follow-up of a multi-cohort phase II clinical trial. Leukemia,2018; 32: 719–728 2. American Cancer Society. Survival rates by stage for multiplemyeloma. https://www.cancer.org/cancer/multiplemyeloma/detailedguide/multiple-myeloma-survival-rates (21.10.2019) 3. Attal M., Lauwers-Cances V., Hulin C., Facon T., Caillot D., EscoffreM., Arnulf B., Macro M., Belhadj K., Garderet L., Roussel M., MathiotC., Avet-Loiseau H., Munshi N.C., Richardson P.G. i wsp.: Autologoustransplantation for multiple myeloma in the era of new drugs:A phase III study of the Intergroupe Francophone Du Myelome (IFM/DFCI 2009 Trial). Blood, 2015; 126: 391–391 4. Avet-Loiseau H., Attal M., Moreau P., Charbonnel C., GarbanF., Hulin C., Leyvraz S., Michallet M., Yakoub-Agha I., Garderet L.,Marit G., Michaux L., Voillat L., Renaud M., Grosbois B. i wsp.: Geneticabnormalities and survival in multiple myeloma: the experienceof the Intergroupe Francophone du Myélome. Blood, 2007;109: 3489–3495 5. Avet-Loiseau H., Leleu X., Roussel M., Moreau P., Guerin-CharbonnelC., Caillot D., Marit G., Benboubker L., Voillat L., Mathiot C.,Kolb B., Macro M., Campion L., Wetterwald M., Stoppa A.M. i wsp.:Bortezomib plus dexamethasone induction improves outcome ofpatients with t(4;14) myeloma but not outcome of patients withdel(17p). J. Clin. Oncol., 2010; 28: 4630–4634
|
|