Family assistants in the meetings space of social workers. A few reflections on the margin of Pierre Bourdieu's field concept

Author:

Ciczkowska-Giedziun Małgorzata1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Uniwersytet Warmińsko-Mazurski w Olsztynie Wydział Nauk Społecznych, Instytut Nauk Pedagogicznych Katedra Pedagogiki Społecznej i Metodologii Badań Edukacyjnych

Abstract

Of all the representatives of social services, social workers are the people with whom family assistants most often come into contact and cooperate. It is between them that the greatest number of interactions takes place. The Act on Family Support and the Foster Care System of 9 June 2011 does not clearly define the areas of cooperation between assistants and social workers. To date, no standards have been developed that would make it possible to define unambiguously the place of family assistance in the social welfare system. Already at the draft stage of the aforementioned law, the lack of clearly defined areas of activity of family assistants was pointed out as a weakness, which was associated with the overlapping of duties of family assistants and social workers. Phenomenographic research I conducted among family assistants shows that they experience difficulties in their relationships with social workers. The results of the analyzes inspired me to rethink the ways of experiencing being a family assistant in a relationship with a social worker. This article takes the form of a re-visit, allowing to reconstruct the thinking and experiences of the family assistants in the new register – this time in the light of Pierre Bourdieu’s field concept.

Publisher

Index Copernicus

Reference20 articles.

1. Ancelovici, M. (2021). Bourdieu in movement: toward a field theory of contentious politics. Social Movement Studies, 20(2), 155–173.

2. Bernaś, M., Trojanowski, P., Tworek, I. (2014). Problemy wdrożeniowe asystencji rodzinnej w świetle doświadczeń i opinii jej adeptów i ich opiekunów. Wrocław: Wydawnictwo Fundacji in Posterum.

3. Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

4. Bourdieu, P. (1985). The Forms of Capital. W: J. G. Richardson, In Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education (s. 241–258). New York: Greenwood.

5. Bourdieu, P. (1998). On Television and Journalism. London: Pluto.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3