Disentangling Administration Errors From Scale Development Errors in Survey Research

Author:

Friesner Dan,Bozman Carl S.,McPherson Matthew

Abstract

In a recent manuscript, Friesner, et al. (2023) used the concept of information entropy to assess the quantity of information in survey responses. They demonstrate how assessments of the quantity of information can be used to identify possible errors in a survey’s administration. A major limitation of their methodology is that it assumes the survey items used to elicit consumer preferences were created appropriately and contained a meaningful quantity of information. The current study addresses this limitation by incorporating a methodology developed by Friesner et al. (2021) into the Friesner et al. (2023) methodology. The combined methodology is applied to the same data studied in both Friesner et al. (2021) and Friesner et al. (2023), which allows for a direct comparison of the quantity of information gained/lost from survey administration versus scale development. The results indicate that the survey used in the empirical application exhibits flaws in both scale design and survey administration.

Publisher

North American Business Press

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3