Author:
Wagner L.,Larour P.,Lackner J.,Schauer H.,Berger E.
Abstract
Abstract
Small-scale crash tests of crash boxes have established themselves as an assessment tool for high strength materials for their application in crash-relevant structures in the automotive body. However, when investigating UHSS grades it can be seen that the performance outcome is highly susceptible to details of the crash box geometry, e.g. shape of cross section or position of spot welds, and the test setup. This may even lead to opposing crash performance ratings for the same grade if different setups are compared. In order to rule out any side effects of specimen geometry and test setup, a simpler test method is desired. If a crash box sustains plastic folding in its first fold it often also sustains the subsequent plastic folding events. Accordingly, the L-profile compression test is presented where a specimen, mimicking a quarter of the crash box cross-section, is compressed, forming a single plastic fold. The crash performance assessment is carried out by means of the so called crash index, a weighted relative measure of crack and fracture lengths within the sample, and correlated to the results of corresponding small scale tests, i.e. bending, notched tensile and hole expansion tests.
Reference14 articles.
1. Characterisation of ductility of ultra-high strength steels;Labudde,2011
2. Side impact crash behavior of presshardened steels - correlation with mechanical properties;Larour,2015
3. On the correlation between fracture toughness and crash resistance of advanced high strength steels;Frómeta,2018
4. Influence of single hat crash box flange triggering and impactor top plate welding strategy on axial crash foldability of AHSS & UHSS sheets;Larour,2019
5. Crushing analysis of metal honeycombs;Wierzbicki;International Journal of Impact Engineering,1983
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献