Comparison of the Performance of Prestressed Ribbed Panels and Hollow Core Panels Supported on Four-Edges

Author:

Zając Jakub,Drobiec Łukasz

Abstract

Abstract Tests of full-scale models of the precast slab with dimensions of 6.30 x 6.30 m, built of two different precast panels, were carried out under short-term load. The models were made of autoclaved aerated concrete (700 type) brick with a thickness of 240 mm and a height of 2.24 m. The slabs were supported at four edges. The first slab was precast prestressed ribbed panels with concrete overtopping. The second slab was made of prestressed hollow-core panels. The panels had the same modular width of 600 mm. Tests were carried out under load placed on the top of the slab. The short-term load was applied sequentially, and displacement measurements were measurement by the electronic method. The load was initially applied evenly distributed. In the last step, part of the load was transferred to one-half of the slabs. The obtained load was different for each half of the slab. The first part of the slab were panels 1 to 5, loaded with the value of 1.7 kN/m2, and the second part was panels 6 to 10 loaded with the value of 7.7 kN/m2. The tests allow determining the difference in slabs' performance depending on shear key construction. The panels maintained the possibility of load redistribution based on their interaction despite the longitudinal joints' work only through the concrete cross-section. The slabs had a different character of transverse displacements depending on the presence of concrete topping. The models revealed a different response to transferring part of the load to one-half of the slabs. There were no cracks in the line of longitudinal joints on the upper surface of the slabs. Also, there were no cracks on the bottom of the panels. At the panels' connection with the wall, rotation and lifting corners of the slabs were noticed. The measured displacements were significantly smaller than for the corresponding models of single-span slabs with a parallel load.

Publisher

IOP Publishing

Subject

General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3