Analysis of student’s error in resolving the Pythagoras problems

Author:

Sari R H Y,Wutsqa D U

Abstract

Abstract This study aims to describe the error made by students in solving Pythagoras questions, to analyse the factors that cause the students to make those errors, and to identify whether students are able to associate trigonometric concepts with Pythagoras. The subject of this study was the eleventh grade students of SMP Negeri 1 Yogyakarta Academic Year 2018/2019. There were 31 samples of students taken as the object of the research. The data collection used was a test. The classification of students’ errors type was done based on Newman process skill errors, inaccuracy, errors in understanding the questions’ intention and errors in the use of notation or misconception. The data analysis technique of the research was conducted through data reduction, data presentation and conclusion. The results showed that the errors percentage in the process was 38%. The less accurate percentage was 25%. The percentage of errors in understanding the intent of the problem was 10%. The percentage of errors in the use of notation was 15%. The percentage in misconception was 12%. The type of errors made by the students were: (1) students not know the meaning of symbols. (2) students not know the purpose of the question. (3) students not know the formula used in problem solving. (4) students cannot solve problems in the algorithm. (5) students cannot solve the problem according to the questions and some students are not able to associate the concept of pythagoras with trigonometry.

Publisher

IOP Publishing

Subject

General Physics and Astronomy

Reference18 articles.

1. Vocational High School Teachers’ Difficulties in Implementing the Assessment in Curriculum 2013 in Yogyakarta Province of Indonesia;Retnawati;Int. J. of Inst.,2016

2. Teachers’ Difficulties in Implementing Thematic Teaching and Learning in Elementary Schools;Retnawati;T. N. Edu. Rev.,2017

3. The Comparison of Accuracy Scores on the Paper and Pencil Testing vs. Computer Based Testing;Retnawati;T:T Turk. Ol. J. Edu. Tech.,2015

4. Discovery Learning with Scientific Approach on Geometry;Ramdhani,2017

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Empowering the Teaching and Learning of Geometry in Basic Education by Combining Extended Reality and Machine Learning;Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems;2024

2. An analysis of high school students’ error in completing trigonometry problems based on Movshovitz-Hadar, Zaslavsky, and Inbar categories;PROCEEDINGS OF THE 4TH INTERNATIONAL SEMINAR ON INNOVATION IN MATHEMATICS AND MATHEMATICS EDUCATION (ISIMMED) 2020: Rethinking the role of statistics, mathematics and mathematics education in society 5.0: Theory, research, and practice;2022

3. Validation and Implementation of Hawgent on Pythagoras Theorem;Journal of Physics: Conference Series;2021-11-01

4. Professional Teachers using Technological Pedagogical Mathematics Knowledge, are Mathematics Pre-Service Teachers Ready?;Journal of Physics: Conference Series;2021-11-01

5. A systematic review on pupils’ misconceptions and errors in trigonometry;Pegem Journal of Education and Instruction;2021-10-01

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3