Abstract
Abstract
In a standard quantum field theory the norm
⟨
Ω
|
Ω
⟩
of the vacuum state is taken to be finite. In this paper we provide a procedure, based on constructing an equivalent wave mechanics, for determining whether or not
⟨
Ω
|
Ω
⟩
actually is finite. We provide an example based on a second-order plus fourth-order scalar field theory, a prototype for quantum gravity, in which it is not. In this example the Lorentzian path integral with a real measure diverges though the Euclidean path integral does not. Thus in this example contributions from the Wick rotation contour cannot be ignored. Since
⟨
Ω
|
Ω
⟩
is not finite, use of the standard Feynman rules is not valid. And while these rules not only lead to states with negative norm, they in fact lead to states with infinite negative norm. However, if the fields in that theory are continued into the complex plane, we show that then there is a domain in the complex plane known as a Stokes wedge in which one can define an appropriate time-independent, positive and finite inner product, viz. the
⟨
L
|
R
⟩
overlap of left-eigenstates and right-eigenstates of the Hamiltonian; with the vacuum state then being normalizable, and with there being no states with negative or infinite
⟨
L
|
R
⟩
norm. In this Stokes wedge it is the Euclidean path integral that diverges while the Lorentzian path integral does not. The concerns that we raise in this paper only apply to bosons since the matrices associated with their creation and annihilation operators are infinite dimensional. Since the ones associated with fermions are finite dimensional, the fermion theory vacuum is automatically normalizable. We discuss some general implications of our results for quantum gravity studies, and show that they are relevant to the construction of a consistent, unitary and renormalizable quantum theory of gravity.
Subject
Physics and Astronomy (miscellaneous)
Reference40 articles.
1. How to quantize gravity and how not to quantize gravity
2. Exactly solvablePT-symmetric Hamiltonian having no Hermitian counterpart
3. The difference in sign between the fourth-order (4.4) and the second-order (1.7) is due to the fact that [ϕ,ϕ...] [ϕ,ϕ˙] as respectively given in (4.3) and (1.2) have opposite signs
4. On Field Theories with Non-Localized Action
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献