Abstract
Environmental policy depends for its success on public participation. However, the scientific construction of environmental issues often means that such participation in policy-making is difficult when the public is not considered scientifically `expert'. Even if the notion of `expertise' is broadened to deal with this problem, this does not ensure truly `public'—i.e. lay—involvement, because lay ideas are still not included but are discounted as `non-scientific'. Further, emphasis on the scientific and environmental education of the general public will not guarantee policy implementation by individuals. Therefore, if we wish to design environmental policy that can be successfully implemented, we must consider other ways in which people relate to their environments as well as through scientific mediation—ways in which people `understand' their environments through culture, morality and social interaction—and build these into environmental policy.
Subject
Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous),Developmental and Educational Psychology,Communication
Reference149 articles.
1. STABILITY AND TRANSFORMATION IN ENVIRONMENTAL GOVERNMENT
2. Macnaghten, P. , Grove-White, R., Jacobs, M. and Wynne, B., 1995, Public Perceptions and Sustainability in Lancashire: Indicators, Institutions, Participation (Preston: Lancaster University/Lancashire County Council), p. 9.
3. Common Inheritance - Collective Responsibility? State, Market and Citizen in The White Paper on the Environment
Cited by
171 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献