Author:
Wang Di,Dong Liang,Mei Jianhao
Abstract
Abstract
Mitigation of climate change requires comprehensive policy arrangements. This article applies a systematic analysis framework comprising ‘vertical policy hierarchy—horizontal policy path—policy instruments’ with Germany, France, and the Netherlands as study cases, and first-hand policy and data from government websites collected, clustered, and matched. The study conducts a comparative analysis of the three countries’ systems, pathways, instruments, and their effectiveness in climate change mitigation. The findings indicate that, firstly, all three countries have relatively well-developed policy systems (laws, regulations, strategies, plans, and policy instruments) based on the six vertical policy hierarchy defined by government governance structure. Secondly, the three countries exhibit commonalities and disparities in seven sectors: energy, transport, buildings, industry, agriculture, forest, and waste. The commonalities stem from EU laws and directives, while disparities arise from resource endowments and emission structures. Thirdly, regarding policy instruments, the commonalities among the three countries are reflected in the dominance of Financial/Fiscal Mechanisms as the primary approach, the leadership position of Governance Mechanisms, the comprehensive coverage of Regulatory Reform, and the massive expenditure in the Direct investment. Individually, (1) the German Regulatory Reform primarily addresses energy resource transformation; France focuses on controlling the transport sector emissions; while the Netherlands commits to renewable energy generation. (2) Germany leads in terms of Commercialization Mechanisms. (3) Financial/Fiscal Mechanisms encompass all sectors, while Germany examplifies the transportation sector digitization, France’s provision of ecological housing loans, and the Netherlands’ support for sustainable agriculture. (4) France distinguishes itself with a forward-thinking approach towards Governance Mechanism including climate financial risks, ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) standards. Fourthly, the significant policy instruments analysis demonstrates that the climate governance of three countries incorporates not only direct or indirect efforts in emission reduction, but also considerations of institutional requirements, fairness, economic effectiveness, synergies, and transformative potential in policy considerations.
Funder
Humanities and Social Sciences Youth Foundation, Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China
The National Social Science Fund of China
Dutch Research Council
National Science Foundation, China
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,General Environmental Science,Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
Reference129 articles.
1. Economic tools to promote transparency and comparability in the Paris Agreement;Aldy;Nat. Clim. Change,2016
2. Beyond the targets: assessing the political credibility of pledges for the Paris Agreement;Averchenkova,2016
3. The impact of strategic climate legislation: evidence from expert interviews on the UK climate change;Averchenkova;Act. Clim. Policy,2021