Abstract
Abstract
State-of-the-art dose assessment models were applied to estimate doses to the population in urban areas contaminated by the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant accident. Assessment results were compared among five models, and comparisons of model predictions with actual measurements were also made. Assessments were performed using both probabilistic and deterministic approaches. Predicted dose distributions for indoor and outdoor workers from a probabilistic approach were in good agreement with the actual measurements. In addition, when the models were applied to assess the doses to the representative person, based on a concept recommended by the International Commission on Radiological Protection and in the International Atomic Energy Agency Safety Standards, it was evident that doses to the representative person obtained with a deterministic approach were always higher than those obtained with a probabilistic approach using the same model.
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Waste Management and Disposal,General Medicine
Reference36 articles.
1. Radiation between dosimeter used at Fukushima etc and radiological protection quantity;J. At. Energy Soc. Japan,2013
2. Spatial variability of the vertical migration of fallout 137Cs in the soil of a pasture, and consequences for long-term predictions;Bunzl;Radiat. Environ. Biophys.,2000
3. European model for inhabited areas—ERMIN 2;Charnock;Radioprotection,2016