Abstract
PurposeFocusing on micro-level indicators, we investigate financial inclusion levels in rural China, examining its determinants and impact on household welfare. We construct a financial inclusion index of four essential financial services: savings, digital payments, credit and insurance. We identify factors influencing financial inclusion among Chinese rural households and assess the effects of financial inclusion on household welfare.Design/methodology/approachWith the entropy method, we use data from the 2019 China Household Finance Survey to assess financial inclusion levels in rural China. Determinants and their impact on welfare are analyzed through probit and ordinary least squares models, respectively. Propensity scoring matching is applied to address potential endogeneity.FindingsWe reveal that rural households exhibit limited usage of formal financial services, with notable regional disparities. The eastern region enjoys the highest financial inclusion and the central region lags behind. Household characteristics such as family size, education level of the household head, income, employment status and financial literacy significantly influence financial inclusion. Financial inclusion positively impacts household welfare as indicated by household consumption expenditure. The use of different types of financial services is crucial with varying but significant effects on household welfare.Originality/valueThis study offers valuable insights into China’s rural financial inclusion progress, highlighting potential barriers and guiding government actions.
Reference60 articles.
1. Multidimensional poverty index 2011: brief methodological note,2011
2. The foundations of financial inclusion: understanding ownership and use of formal accounts;Journal of Financial Intermediation,2016
3. Financial access and household welfare: evidence from Mauritania,2016
4. Properties of sufficiency and statistical tests;Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A - Mathematical and Physical Sciences,1937
5. Financial inclusion–Measuring progress and progress in measuring,2016