Author:
Lin Tong-Tong,Yang Ming-Zhi,Zhang Lei,Wang Tian-Tian,Tao Yu,Zhong Sha
Abstract
Purpose
The aerodynamic differences between the head car (HC) and tail car (TC) of a high-speed maglev train are significant, resulting in control difficulties and safety challenges in operation. The arch structure has a significant effect on the improvement of the aerodynamic lift of the HC and TC of the maglev train. Therefore, this study aims to investigate the effect of a streamlined arch structure on the aerodynamic performance of a 600 km/h maglev train.
Design/methodology/approach
Three typical streamlined arch structures for maglev trains are selected, i.e. single-arch, double-arch and triple-arch maglev trains. The vortex structure, pressure of train surface, boundary layer, slipstream and aerodynamic forces of the maglev trains with different arch structures are compared by adopting improved delayed detached eddy simulation numerical calculation method. The effects of the arch structures on the aerodynamic performance of the maglev train are analyzed.
Findings
The dynamic topological structure of the wake flow shows that a change in arch structure can reduce the vortex size in the wake region; the vortex size with double-arch and triple-arch maglev trains is reduced by 15.9% and 23%, respectively, compared with a single-arch maglev train. The peak slipstream decreases with an increase in arch structures; double-arch and triple-arch maglev trains reduce it by 8.89% and 16.67%, respectively, compared with a single-arch maglev train. The aerodynamic force indicates that arch structures improve the lift imbalance between the HC and TC of a maglev train; double-arch and triple-arch maglev trains improve it by 22.4% and 36.8%, respectively, compared to a single-arch maglev train.
Originality/value
This study compares the effects of a streamlined arch structure on a maglev train and its surrounding flow field. The results of the study provide data support for the design and safe operation of high-speed maglev trains.
Reference31 articles.
1. Railway applications – aerodynamics. Part 6: requirements and test procedures for cross wind assessment;CEN European Standard,2010
2. Railway applications - aerodynamics. Part 4: requirements and test procedures for aerodynamics on open track;CEN European Standard,2013
3. Aerodynamic drag reduction of high-speed maglev train based on air blowing/suction;Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics,2023
4. Analysis of the aerodynamic effects of different nose lengths on two trains intersecting in a tunnel at 350 km/h;Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology,2017
5. Dynamic analysis of the effect of nose length on train aerodynamic performance;Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics,2019
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献