The current state of sustainability in bioscience laboratories
Author:
Wright Hazel A.,Ironside Joseph E.,Gwynn‐Jones Dylan
Abstract
PurposeThis study aims to identify the current barriers to sustainability in the bioscience laboratory setting and to determine which mechanisms are likely to increase sustainable behaviours in this specialised environment.Design/methodology/approachThe study gathers qualitative data from a sample of laboratory researchers presently conducting experimentation in the biological sciences. A questionnaire, regarding sustainability in the laboratory, was developed and distributed to all bioscience researchers at Aberystwyth University.FindingsAlthough the majority of respondents had favourable attitudes to sustainability, almost three‐quarters (71 per cent) stated that they were not conducting their research in the most sustainable way possible. The factors most likely to hinder sustainable behaviour were lack of support, lack of information and time constraints. However, monetary costs and benefits, closely followed by “other” costs and benefits, were most likely to encourage sustainable behaviour in the laboratory.Research limitations/implicationsThere is a need to extend the present research to other types of biological research, such as field‐based studies. Different biological disciplines may have different consumable requirements and waste streams, thereby changing the barriers to sustainability observed.Practical implicationsThe findings have immediate practical implication for higher education institutions wishing to adopt researcher‐approved mechanisms to reduce the environmental impact of biological laboratory research.Originality/valueThis is the first study to design a sustainability questionnaire which is specific to research scientists and laboratory users. The paper is therefore of immense value to the numerous global higher education institutions with working laboratories which seek to minimise the environmental impact of research.
Subject
Education,Human Factors and Ergonomics
Reference30 articles.
1. Alabaster, T. and Blair, D. (1996), “Greening the university”, in Huckle, J. and Sterling, S. (Eds), Education for Sustainability, Earthscan, London, pp. 86‐104. 2. Bell, G., Mills, E., Sartor, D., Siminovitch, M. and Piette, M.A. (1996), Design Guide for Energy Efficient Research Laboratories, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Centre for Building Science, Applications Team, Berkeley, CA, September, available at: http://ateam.lbl.gov/DesignGuide/DGHtm/abstract.energyefficientresearchlaboratories.htm. 3. Bird, A. (1996), “Training for environmental improvement”, in Wehrmeyer, W. (Ed.), Greening People: Human Resources and Environmental Management, Greenleaf Publishing, Sheffield, pp. 227‐46. 4. Bithas, K.P. and Christofakis, M. (2006), “Environmentally sustainable cities. Critical review and operational conditions”, Sustainable Development, Vol. 14, pp. 177‐89. 5. Blaze Corcoran, P. and Wals, A.E.J. (2004), “The problematics of sustainability in higher education: a synthesis”, in Blaze Corcoran, P. and Wals, A.E.J. (Eds), Higher Education and the Challenge of Sustainability: Problematics, Promise and Practice, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp. 87‐8.
Cited by
17 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|